The Mandela Effect Debunked

This End Times Deception post debunks the Mandela Effect PSYOP, Psychological Operation.

Here is a video that shows how there appears to be changes in the KJV.

It’s war on the minds of believers to get them to doubt the King James, the one version of the Bible that people believe that they can rely on.

People are saying that CERN was used to travel back in time to make the changes, which then caused our current reality to be different.

But if they traveled back in time to make the changes, then everything would have been changed from that point forward, and everyone would have memories based on their changes.

So if they changed the KJV to say ‘bottles’ instead of ‘wineskins’, then everyone would have a memory of bottles.

Don’t you think that the many employees of Chick-Fil-A would have noticed the name change from Chic-Fil-A, and said something about it?

Don’t you think that the many employees and owners of Ford would have noticed that their logo had changed, and said something about it?

Don’t you think that the many employee’s at J.C. Penney would have noticed the name changed from J.C. Penny, and said something about it?

I worked at a Sears for nine years, and our main competition in the mall was J.C. Penney.  The name has not been changed.

It seems that the Mandela Effect only effects people who see the information on Facebook and YouTube, because the rest of the world has not noticed.

I will provide some proofs below, but here is how you can prove that the words have not been changed in the King James Bible.

Here is a link to Smith’s Bible Dictionary, which has been used by students of the Bible since its introduction in the 1860’s.  Just look up the word that supposedly got changed, and it will show you that it has always been in the King James.

Many great theologians have written whole Bible commentaries based on the King James Bible.  You can reference their comments that were written from the 16th-19th centuries, which include the words, proving they have not changed.

Here is a link to Matthew Poole’s English Annotations on the Holy Bible, which was written in the 17th century. Look up the passage to see his notes.

I also like Adam Clarke Commentary, which was written in the 19th century.

They proclaim that the Lord’s Prayer has been changed.

They seem to be confusing Matthew 6:14-15, which is the long version of the Lord’s Prayer; with Luke 6:14, which is the short version. When they look at Matthew 6:14-15, it doesn’t seem to read as their remember.

“For if ye forgive men their trespasses, your heavenly Father will also forgive you: But if ye forgive not men their trespasses, neither will your Father forgive your trespasses.” Matthew 6:14

What they remember is found in Luke 11:4:

“And it came to pass, that, as he was praying in a certain place, when he ceased, one of his disciples said unto him, Lord, teach us to pray, as John also taught his disciples. And he said unto them, When ye pray, say, Our Father which art in heaven, Hallowed be thy name. Thy kingdom come. Thy will be done, as in heaven, so in earth. Give us day by day our daily bread. And forgive us our sins; for we also forgive every one that is indebted to us. And lead us not into temptation; but deliver us from evil.” Luke 11:1-4

When you look at quotes about the Lord’s Prayer, some people substituted the word “trespasses” from Matthew 6:14, to modify Luke 11:4, so that it reads “And forgive us our trespasses; as we also forgive every one that trespasses against us.”

They proclaim that the lion was changed to a wolf, in Isaiah 11:6

That is an association that people have been conditioned with.  No doubt many Pastors have said ‘the lion and the lamb’, but the Bible has never said that.

Isaiah 65:25 also says the wold, “The wolf and the lamb shall feed together, and the lion shall eat straw like the bullock: and dust shall be the serpent’s meat. They shall not hurt nor destroy in all my holy mountain, saith the LORD.”

Here’s a manuscript from the Dead Sea Scrolls which proves it out.

Wolf and the Lamb, not Lion and the Lamb

Mandela Effect: Lion & Lamb FULLY Debunked with 18 centuries of proof of Isaiah 11:6

If you Google Isaiah 11:6 and look at the images, you see memes like this:


Here’s one that creates the false association. The verse says ‘wolf’, but the image has a ‘lion’.

Lion Lamb Wolf Isaiah 11:6 Mandela Effect

If you go to Bible Hub and look up that verse, every Bible version says ‘wolf’.

The NIV, NAS, ESV, NKJ, YLT, etc., all say ‘wolf’.

So the Mandela effect would have had to change all Bibles, not just the King James.

Here are Bibles that preceded the King James, which all say ‘wolf’.

The Geneva Bible (1587)
The wolfe also shall dwell with the lambe, and the leopard shall lie with the kid, & the calfe, and the lyon, and the fat beast together, and a litle childe shall leade them.

The Bishop’s Bible (1568)
The Woolfe shall dwell with the Lambe, and the Leoparde shall lye downe by the Goate: Bullockes, Lions, and cattell, shall kepe company together, so that a litle chylde shall leade them.

Miles Coverdale Bible (1535)
The shal ye wolfe dwel with the labe, and the leoparde shal lye downe by the gote. Bullokes, lyons and catel shal kepe company together, so that a litle childe shal dryue them forth.

The Wycliffe Bible (1395)
A wolf schal dwelle with a lombe, and a parde schal reste with a kide; a calf, and a lioun, and a scheep schulen dwelle togidere, and a litil child schal dryue hem.

And here are Bible commentaries from the top theologians of the 16th-19th century, who all speak of the wolf.

Albert Barnes’ Notes on the Bible 19th century
Isaiah 11:6
The wolf. By nature the wolf preys upon the lamb, and the leopard upon the kid, and the adder is venomous, and the bear, and the cow, and the lion, and the ox, cannot live together.

Adam Clarke’s Commentary on the Bible Early 19th century
Isaiah 11:6
The wolf also shall, etc. “Then shall the wolf,” etc. – The idea of the renewal of the golden age, as it is called, is much the same in the Oriental writers with that of the Greeks and Romans: – the wild beasts grow tame; serpents and poisonous herbs become harmless; all is peace and harmony, plenty and happiness: –

Geneva Bible Footnotes 16th century
Isaiah 11:6
The wolf also shall dwell with the lamb, and the leopard shall lie down with the kid; and the calf and the young lion and the fatling together; and a little child shall lead them.

John Gill’s Exposition of the Entire Bible 18th century
Isaiah 11:6
And the wolf also shall dwell with the lamb,… This, and the three following verses Isa 11:7, describe the peaceableness of the Messiah’s kingdom; and which the Targum introduces in this manner,

Matthew Poole’s Commentary on the Holy Bible 17th century
Isaiah 11:6
Ver. 6. The wolf also shall dwell with the lamb, &c.; the creatures shall be restored to that state of innocency in which they were before the fall of man.

These Bibles and commentaries did not get changed. People associate the Lion and the Lamb, because those are descriptions of Messiah. It’s a false association, that was created by Pastors, by songs, by books, etc.

They proclaim that wineskins was changed to bottles in Matthew 9:17.

Neither do men put new wine into old bottles: else the bottles break, and the wine runneth out, and the bottles perish: but they put new wine into new bottles, and both are preserved.

The translators of the KJV felt that the word ‘bottles’ fit the description best, as they had used bottles 10 other times and the word bottle 14 times.

Bottles: Joshua 9:4, 9:13, 1 Samuel 25:18, Job 32:19, 38:37, Jeremiah 48:12, Hosea 7:5, Matthew 9:17, Mark 2:22, Luke 5:37, 5:38

Bottle: Genesis 21:14, 21:15, 21:19, Judges 4:19, 1 Samuel 1:24, 10:3, 16:20, 2 Samuel 16:1, Psalms 56:8, 119:83, Jeremiah 13:12, 19:1, 19:10, Habakkuk 2:15

“Smith’s Bible Dictionary” has been used by students of the Bible since its introduction in the 1860’s.  For the word ‘bottle‘ is says:

The great leathern bottles are made of the skin of a he-goat, and the small ones, that serve instead of a bottle of water on the road, are made of a kids skin. The effect of external heat upon a skin bottle is indicated in ( Psalms 119:83 ) “a bottle in the smoke,” and of expansion produced by fermentation in ( Matthew 9:17 ) “new wine in old bottles.” Vessels of metal, earthen or glassware for liquids were in use among the Greeks, Egyptians, Etruscans and Assyrians, and also no doubt among the Jews, especially in later times. Thus ( Jeremiah 19:1 ) “a potters earthen bottle.” (Bottles were made by the ancient Egyptians of alabaster, gold, ivory and stone. They were of most exquisite workmanship and elegant forms. Tear-bottles were small urns of glass or pottery, made to contain the tears of mourners at funerals, and placed in the sepulchres at Rome and in Palestine. In some ancient tombs they are found in great numbers. ( Psalms 56:8 ) refers to this custom.–ED.)

The following esteemed theologians who wrote King James Bible commentaries during the 17th-19th centuries, all describe the use of the word ‘bottles’.

Albert Barnes’ Notes on the New and Old Testaments.
John Calvin’s Commentaries.
Adam Clarke’s Commentary on the Bible.
Commentary from the 1599 edition of the Geneva Bible.
John Gill’s Exposition of the Entire Bible.
Jamieson-Fausset-Brown Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible.
Matthew Henry’s Whole Bible Commentary.
Matthew Poole’s Commentary on the Holy Bible.
John Wesley’s Bible Notes.

Every modern Bible uses the word bottles, instead of wineskins as used in the King James.

Most pastors do not use the King James due to archaic language, so they no doubt have repeatedly used the word wineskins, which created the association in people’s minds.

They proclaim that the word ‘tires‘ was inserted into Ezekiel 24:23

And your tires shall be upon your heads, and your shoes upon your feet: ye shall not mourn nor weep; but ye shall pine away for your iniquities, and mourn one toward another.

“Smith’s Bible Dictionary” has been used by students of the Bible since its introduction in the 1860′. For the word ‘tire‘ it says:

an old English word for headdress. It was an ornamental headdress worn on festive occasions, ( Ezekiel 24:17 Ezekiel 24:23 ) and perhaps, as some suppose, also an ornament for the neck worn by both women, ( Isaiah 3:18 ) and men, and even on the necks of camels. ( Judges 8:21 Judges 8:26 )

John Gill, a biblical scholar in the 18th century, wrote a whole Bible commentary on the King James called John Gill’s Exposition of the Entire Bible. For Ezekiel 24:23 he confirms that is says tires.

And your tires shall be upon your heads, and your shoes upon your feet. As will be necessary while travelling, and when carrying captive to a foreign country, as now will be their case:

It’s not talking about car tires, but an ornamental headdress that people wore on their head.

They proclaim that Messiah has been changed from being the ‘cornerstone‘ to the ‘head of the corner‘.

Once again, it’s just ignorance of other Scriptures which declare that Messiah is the cornerstone, which causes them to believe that 1 Peter 2:7 has been changed.

which be disobedient, the stone which the builders disallowed, the same is made the head of the corner,

In the previous verse, 1 Peter 2:6, Peter declares that Messiah is the corner stone.

Wherefore also it is contained in the scripture, Behold, I lay in Sion a chief corner stone, elect, precious: and he that believeth on him shall not be confounded.

The Scriptures still declared that Messiah is the cornerstone.

Jesus saith unto them, Did ye never read in the scriptures, The stone which the builders rejected, the same is become the head of the corner: this is the Lord’s doing, and it is marvellous in our eyes? Matthew 21:42

And have ye not read this scripture; The stone which the builders rejected is become the head of the corner: Mark 12:10

And he beheld them, and said, What is this then that is written, The stone which the builders rejected, the same is become the head of the corner? Luke 20:17

This is the stone which was set at nought of you builders, which is become the head of the corner. Acts 4:11

For the king knoweth of these things, before whom also I speak freely: for I am persuaded that none of these things are hidden from him; for this thing was not done in a corner. Acts 26:26

And are built upon the foundation of the apostles and prophets, Jesus Christ himself being the chief corner stone; Ephesians 2:20

1 Peter 2:7 was not changed. Peter had just provided another way to say it, as he had already said ‘corner stone’ in the previous verse.

They proclaim that Luke 17:34-35 said ‘two people’ would be in the same bed, not two men.

I tell you, in that night there shall be two men in one bed; the one shall be taken, and the other shall be left.
Two women shall be grinding together; the one shall be taken, and the other left.

The context of the passage is not about Messiah teaching against sexual perversion.  He was simply naming times when two people would be together, in similar circumstances; one taken, one not.

In our privileged world we think that the only reason two men would be in the same bed is for sexual perversion.  Go live in a poor country and you will see that they sleep in the same bed.    In a situation where many people have to live in the same house, should a man and woman who aren’t married sleep in the same bed?  No!  The men should sleep in the same bed, to ‘prevent‘ sexual problems.

They proclaim that Luke 17:35 used to say that two women were grinding at the mill, but now are just grinding, which they say is a perversion.

Luke 17:35 never had the word mill, but Matthew 24:41 does, “Two women shall be grinding at the mill; the one shall be taken, and the other left.”

Just another case of people not doing their homework to see that one Gospel has the word mill, thus the association; which they think has been changed in Luke. The word mill was never in Luke, so nothing has been changed.

The two women ground together because it took both of them to operate the hand mill, as one could not do it alone.

People proclaim that Exodus 13:12 used to say ‘womb’, but now says ‘matrix’. 

That thou shalt set apart unto the LORD all that openeth the matrix, and every firstling that cometh of a beast which thou hast; the males shall be the LORD’S.”

They are thinking of Exodus 13:2, which says “Sanctify unto me all the firstborn, whatsoever openeth the womb among the children of Israel, both of man and of beast: it is mine.

So it’s just a matter of confusion between the two verses, which have never changed.

They claim that Peanuts writer Charles M. Schulz’s name used to be Schultz.

I grew up loving Snoopy! His name was never Schultz, that is just an association that people have because that name is more common. People hear Schulz and just assume that it’s spelled Schultz.

Don’t you think that his family would have noticed the name change and said something?

Does it really seem plausible that CERN changed every newspaper that was ever printed which featured his comic strip? And all of the merchandise was changed too? I think not!

Here are links to images of Charles Schulz’s star on the Hollywood Walk of Fame.

Charles M. Schulz Highland Arena on Snelling Avenue and Ford Parkway in Saint Paul, Minnesota.

And his Congressional Gold Medal

Here is a testimony from Ryan James who had originally proclaimed that the Mandela Effect was true.  He follows it with proofs that it is not true.

I’m burdened to share with you what all I’ve learned since posting about the Mandela Effect last Saturday night. I must say again that I’m terribly sorry for posting about this without examining it further. Like many, I was beyond shocked to see a Scripture that I had known for years was not the way I thought it was in the KJV Bible. I felt like a spell had been cast or somehow history was changed.

After further examination, time with God, and fellowship with trusted brethren, I must say that I do believe this is all a demonic PSYOP to make many question God’s Holy Word, question their sanity, and also to discredit the truth movement.

What they have done is they took many things that the masses thought were true and used it against us to make us think it actually was and that we are somehow living in another reality.

I’m going to debunk each and every example that I posted with hopes that the ones that still believe in this will not give into this deception any longer. This is deep psychological warfare and we need to be aware of Satan’s devices.

Example 1 Debunked- Matthew 7:1 is a verse that many, including myself thought was, “Judge not, lest ye be judged..” and the KJV states that it’s “Judge not, that ye be not judged.” Now, to begin with, the meaning is the exact same. If Satan was going to try to change God’s Word, he wouldn’t change a verse to mean the exact same thing. It just doesn’t make sense. Yes, the serpent is subtle, but his changes would effect the meaning of a verse or passage. When Paul Washer quoted Judge not, lest ye be judged…”, he wasn’t quoting it from his Bible. It he was, then yes, RED FLAG. But that’s not the case. You can go online and see time and time again that Matthew 7:1 in the KJV has always been “Judge not, that ye be not judged.” Many people, including myself thought that “lest ye be judged” came from the KJV because it’s Old English or Shakespearean if you will, but it did not. The Orthodox Jewish Bible does state the misquote of Matthew 7:1 the way we thought it was. When people repeat things over and over, you will in fact believe it is true. It never came out of the KJV from what I can gather, it’s just highly misquoted.

Example 2 Debunked- Matthew 9:17 has the word “bottles” instead of “wineskins.” Again, this doesn’t change the meaning of this verse the slightest bit. It seems as though every other version of the Bible says “wineskins” and it’s been repeated and preached so much that there’s no reason to believe it doesn’t say “wineskins.” Apparently the translators of the KJV thought “bottles” fit the Scriptures best as in comparison to “wineskins.” You can go on You Tube and see for yourself many preachers reading “bottles” out of the KJV. God’s Word will always stand. If changes are made to the Bible, scholars of the Word of God would gather and have the correct one printed in days.

Example 3 Debunked- “Sex and the City” used to be “Sex in the City.” Not true. Although, “Sex in the City” makes much more sense, it’s been misspoken time and time again, even in newspaper articles and promotions. It’s always been “Sex and the City.” Subconsciously, “Sex in the City” sounds much better. Our memories are still in tact guys. You want to know the truth? Call up the producers or cast members or die hard fans.

Example 4 Debunked- Mr. Rogers Neighborhood Theme Song “It’s a beautiful day in this neighborhood” is a highly misquoted song lyric. Many say, “It’s a beautiful day in THE neighborhood” instead of “THIS.” It’s been repeated wrong in movies, TV shows, and because “the” sounds better than “this” in our subconscious, we say it wrong thinking it’s the right lyric. Ask anyone that worked on the show. It’s always been “this” and not “the”.

Example 5 Debunked- This one freaked me out a bit and it’s the fact the movie “Interview with the Vampire” is misquoted often as “Interview with A Vampire.” It’s another one of those things that makes much more sense in our subconscious, so we say it thinking its correct. You can look back at old interviews and posters and promotions and it’s always been “Interview with THE Vampire.” Humans tend to say what makes sense the most. It’s been misquoted on TV and magazines and people that see that think it’s the correct title, when it’s not.

Example 6 Debunked- this one is easier to explain. The movie “Snow White and the 7 dwarfs” has a famous quote, “Magic Mirror on the wall, who is the fairest one of them all?” The masses believe it’s “”Mirror, Mirror on the wall” instead because if you go back to the actual children’s book of “Snow White” it’s quoted “Mirror, Mirror.” Generally, plays and musicals will go by what the book says rather than the movie itself and that’s why you hear the quote, “Mirror, Mirror on the wall” all of the time. It was actually used. Just not in the movie.

Example 7 Debunked- This one is also easily explained and it’s the fact many believe that “Berenstain Bears” used to be spelled “Berenstein Bears.” Not true. Here’s why. The publishers of “Berenstain Bears” didn’t sign onto many other books, plays, posters, toys, advertisements, etc. with the spelling of “Berenstein Bears.” You did actually see It spelled like you might remember it, but it wasn’t on the official books. It’s another one of those things that sounds better, so your subconscious went right along with it.

Example 8 Debunked- “Looney Tunes” is not “Looney Toons” although it looks so much better. It’s yet another subconscious mind trick. “Toons” is short for “cartoon”, so of course you would think its “Toons” and not “Tunes”. Not the case. You may have thought it was “Toons” because there were shows like “Tiny Toons Adventures” that had it spelled the other way.

Example 9 Debunked- This one got me pretty good. It’s from Star Wars Episode 5 where Darth Vader says to Luke, “No, I am your father.” It’s been repeated “Luke, I am your father” in movies, TV shows, advertisements, t-shirts, and all sorts of others things. There’s been articles about this misquote for many years. Even the biggest Star Wars fans get it wrong. It’s yet another subconscious mind trick. Someone said it, the masses caught on, and the rest is history.

Note: The original film came out in 1977 a time before the internet and everybody remembers the original line which says “Luke I am your father“. Fast forward to current times and you will find that the film has been remastered and re-release on DVD; it is on this current version that it now says “No I am your father“.

Example 10 Debunked- The TV commercial for Sara Lee goes “Nobody doesn’t like Sara Lee.” But that doesn’t make sense, right? That is exactly why we think it’s “Nobody does it like Sara Lee.” It’s not correct. People have been misquoting this for dozens of years. You can just do a quick Google search and see that it’s one of the most misquoted slogans of all time. Satan knew it and he used it for his advantage.

Well guys, it’s been a tough 3-4 days for me. I barely slept Saturday evening and Sunday at work, I felt like I stepped into the Matrix. But suddenly, people like Joshua Busby and others were coming up with resources debunking mistruths and at first, I was a little upset because I was convinced it was true. But when I woke up on Monday morning, the Holy Spirit told me that this is all a lie.

I began researching and looking over God’s Word again and concluded that I had been tricked. This is the type of mind tricks that magicians and mediums will do to freak your mind out. It’s pure psychological trickery. Nobody went back in time and changed anything. God’s Word hasn’t changed. Rest easy friends.

Please, do not tie this PSYOP to other conspiracies that people in the truth movement present. It’s illogical and misleading. Most of this world is blind and deceived by indoctrination and what they see on the Tell-lie-vision and mainstream media outlets. Truthers are going to be wrong about things. We are human. It’s when truthers refuse to admit they as wrong that causes problems.

I URGE YOU GUYS WITH ALL SINCERITY >>DO NOT PUSH THIS PSYOP<< People will discredit you and shut everything you said in the past off as “conspiracy” instead of truth. I want this post to edify and reprove anyone that is still thinking the Word of God had changed. It hasn’t! It’s the SAME. I love you guys.


342 thoughts on “The Mandela Effect Debunked”

  1. this article is false. there have indeed been Bible changes. the Lord’s Prayer no longer says “forgive our trespasses as we forgive those who trespass against us” anywhere in any of the gospels. I notice that you left out this major, major change. But i memorized it that way exactly with total deliberation because it’s a very direct and clear instruction from Jesus on how to pray.

    The mandela effect’s changes are not actual changes to time itself. it’s something else, like a counterfeit $100 bill. if it was actual changes to time, people who have not have any residual memory.

    • You seem to be confusing Matthew 6:14-15, which is the long version of the Lord’s Prayer; with Luke 6:14, which is the short version.

      Luke 11:1 And it came to pass, that, as he was praying in a certain place, when he ceased, one of his disciples said unto him, Lord, teach us to pray, as John also taught his disciples.

      Luke 11:2 And he said unto them, When ye pray, say, Our Father which art in heaven, Hallowed be thy name. Thy kingdom come. Thy will be done, as in heaven, so in earth.

      Luke 11:3 Give us day by day our daily bread.

      Luke 11:4 And forgive us our sins; for we also forgive every one that is indebted to us. And lead us not into temptation; but deliver us from evil.

  2. What about the word couch which is now in the KJV. The couch wasn’t invented till 1895. The KJV was written in 1611. You are saying Jesus said take up your couch? Jesus is now a financial advisor and tells people to put their money in a bank to get the interest. You are buring your head in the sand and refusing to see these Satanic changes. Wake up and get face the fact that the bible is being attacked and is being made into a mockery.

    • You can reference the word couch in these Bible study tools

      The Strong’s Greek word for couch is 2826 klinidion: a pallet or little couch:—bed.

      John Gill’s Exposition of the Entire Bible on Luke 5:19, which was written in the 18th century, references the word couch:
      and let him down through the tiling with his couch, into the midst before Jesus; that is, they untiled the roof, or took away the tiles which were about the trap door, or passage, into the inside of the house; and so making it wider, let down the man upon his couch, or bed, into the middle of the room and of the people, just before Jesus, where he was sitting

      What became known as the modern day couch was invented in 1895, but the word preceded that. Here’s the etymology of the word, which goes back to the 14th century; which is before the KJV.

      It’s amazing that you come here making accusations, but it’s your ignorance that is the problem.

  3. This looks to me like a compression artifact owing to the way the brain stores information. In each case of alleged Mandela Effect you will find that a number, a phrase, etc has been modified slightly to match an already learned pattern elsewhere in the brain. That’s why people think there are 52 states, because there are 52 weeks in the year, and they think It’s the Bernstein Bears instead of the Berenstain Bears (because they already know Bernstein as a name), or it’s J.C. Penny (they already know of the world penny) instead of the actual name of J.C. Penney’s.

    It’s just how memory works, guys. When we need to maximize storage space or bandwidth in computers we use similar lossy compression techniques. Lo and behold, God invented data compression before we did. He’s a smart One!

  4. One thing I don’t understand is the Wizard of Oz, where they show the Scarecrow with a silver pistol. What is that about? The other stuff, I know can just be from people talking, changing over the years that way. Also, I just watched a video where they were supposedly showing a newspaper from 1918 saying the Titanic was towed and no passengers were lost. Huh?

  5. I firmly believe in Jesus but you are wrong, many of us have experiences changes in the nature of our reality.
    Seven Threescore and Seven used to be in the book of revelation and was THE number of man were as the BEAST the enemy has the number Six Threescore and Six which is the number of A man.
    Back before the abolition of apartheid in south Africa the white separatists whom were demanding a separate state if Apartheid was abolished were led by a guy called Eugene Terre’blanche whom has since been murdered by a black South African far worker and when he was interviewed by the BBC back then he claimed that all non whites were the beast (he was obviously wrong the beasts number is the number of A man not all man) and that the white people were Seven Seven Seven (A Mis translation of Seven Threescore and Seven which is of course 7 60 and 7 or 767).

    I was scandalized when I saw the interview and regarded the guy as a blasphemer but by far the greater evil is the one that has removed the word’s and altered the bible to suit so form of attempted angelic coup which must have taken place.

    Sorry but Our’s is a war with powers and principality’s those in high places, if you had been touched by the holy spirit you would know this is not a lie, I have neither added nor taken away from the Revelation but to those that have the punishment is spelled out perfectly within the sacred text.

    Also this changed happened sometime between 1989 and 1993 so was definitely NOT the work of Cern but did definitely take place.

    What colour is the sky, you know it used to be blue, go into any hardware store and ask for sky blue paint, is the sky that colour, what colour did kid’s used to paint it as and then the sun, is that yellow golden or is it white these day’s.
    Of course this could just be atmospheric pollution or perhaps the colour sensitivity of my eye’s has diminished as I get older but?.

    The point is that I accept that Christ walked in the Flesh, he is my Lord, my ONE true King and My god incarnate, I call no man father but he that is my father in HEAVEN, I am a Christian and I know that it has changed but I do not blame Cern, we are in a war, we will win, we already have in fact but the war is still going on in spite of the fact the evil know they have lost as they are trying to forestall there own doom and will not simply lie down, the devil is trying to destroy as many soul’s as he can.

    My belief in what I know to be true does not mean you experiences or REMEMBER the same thing, I was born in 70 so am 48 now, I will keep what I read many time’s before it was altered safe in my heart, written upon the pillar of my heart.

    Don’t accuse your brothers and sisters, do not judge, Let GOD open your eye’s to what he want’s you to see and your brothers and sisters there eye’s to what he want’s them to see and stop this attempt at a rebuttal of something you don’t even understand, in fact none of us do though we may seek answers, some blame Cern but that does not do it for me since Cern was not even operational when I saw this change.

    Now maybe God has created the universe before have you ever thought about that?.
    Jesus said THERE IS NOTHING (NOTHING) NEW UNDER THE SUN, be that technology, sciences, man walking on the moon, computers it’s all been done before, perhaps the entire universe has been created and destroyed before but remember god is not bound by time and before him there is no time (Before Abraham I AM).

    The Lord is the Lord that is all I need to know, He is also MY KING the one and only rightful king before whom all righteous king’s throw down there own crown’s.
    Thou shalt have no other God’s before me I personally take to also include king’s since He is the rightful king, the everlasting prince of peace, the lord of lord’s and king of king’s and unlike old Ozymandias (Ramases) the REAL Lord Jesus is truly eternal, his kingdom is NOT one of dust BUT the LORD OWNS THE WORLD AND THE FULLNESS THEREOF.

    • A confused Christian. Lots of those around. If there were enough power to change reality, the Satan would have stopped Jesus from Going to the cross. Wake up.

  6. Thank you for posting this article. I have been very concerned about all the ridiculous “Mandela Effect” assertions. Makes people doubt their own senses,
    and now the truth of God’s Word. How could it have come to this?

    • The enemy has created many deceptions, which the public has been fooled by, such as 9/11. People know in their senses that steel-framed building don’t collapse at free-fall speed, yet they have believed the official narrative that jet fuel caused that to happen. Here’s a 5-minutes video that shows the absurdity of the official narrative.

      They have dumbed people down with fluoride in the water, and through mind control via the mainstream media.

  7. My KJV doesn’t use the word ETHER describing the waters above the earth, it just says heaven. Is their any version that keeps this word in Genesis? The mathematics originally studied in the Bible were very accurate. the change of one word changes the meanings of many verses. I want my literal translation back in original text not paraphrase “here a little, there a little”.

  8. I have a Bachelor’s degree in Christianity from 2007, a fundamental school, where we studied each book of the bible and memorized many of the verses (KJV). I can attest that many of the Bible verses have altered such as Isaiah 6:11 from lion to wolf, Matthew 9:17 & Mark 2:22 wineskins to bottles, Luke 19: 23 money exchangers to bank, Luke 17:31 possessions to stuff. There are so many more examples it is overwhelming! It is also in the media such as you cited movies. If people truly researched you can find sources, but just look at all the businesses named “Lion and Lamb.” Wouldn’t the be named “Wolf and Lamb?” Use common sense, if that had always been in the Bible, wouldn’t people have named their businesses after that?!! As they say watch out for wolves in sheep’s clothing!!

    • People use the Lion and the Lamb, because it represents the two aspects of Messiah. That has nothing to do with the verse which is pointing to a time of peace, when the natural predator of the lamb, the wolf; is at peace with lambs. Use common sense!

    • Laurie you are VERY blessed to be able to see these changes. Your heart condition is one that sides with truth. You are of course correct. The changes are absolutely overwhelming. Don’t forget the words Oracle and Matrix. If that’s not a tell idk what is. I have a theory on why some see and some don’t. There are many different situations regarding the Mandela effect. You may be interested in this article. its the first article “Why some see and others don’t”

  9. “Most pastors do not use the King James due to archaic language, so they no doubt have repeatedly used the word wineskins, which created the association in people’s minds.” – Isn’t that comment an oxymoron? Isn’t ‘wineskins’ much more archaic than ‘bottles’? You obviously know few Baptists! I have heard many pastors, especially the Baptist, say they only trust the KJV. Here’s 1 I found this AM –

  10. I went through many sleepness nights to get to the bottom of this psyop. I accumulated over 100 MEs and rationalized them to be misremembering and bad memory and spelling mistakes.

    But there were 2 that I could not explain because they were something really close to me and I thought I knew backwards and forwards. Dolly had braces (Moonraker) and there were 4 people in JFK’s car. JFK’s driver was theorized to be his killer, not in this reality. The Zapruder film footage changed subtlely, as if he stepped to the right by 10 feet. Jack Ruby’s killshot on LHO also changed, video footage-wise; we now see an obstructed back shot opposed to a frontal gut shot as I remember.

    In this reality, Dolly never has braces and there are 6 people in JFK’s car.

    • “In this reality, Dolly never has braces and there are 6 people in JFK’s car.” That’s the 2 you’re sure of?
      I never saw Star Wars, so don’t know about Dolly’s braces, but I saw it that day on TV when Kennedy was shot and there were 6 in the limo.
      The 2 I am almost sure of is ‘Haas’ avocadoes – Now said always to be ‘Hass’
      and the conjoined VW logo is now said to always have had a separation between the letters V&W.

  11. Don’t you think if it was a strong delusion, the employees of the companies would be under it also? It’s not a weak delusion that God sends!

    Don’t you listen to the fact that all literature has been changed to support the new scripture? This is nonsense research. You may as well just say look it says wolf in the Bible now so that that. Nothing more to discuss.

    Don’t you think Satan might be a bit craftier than you?

    Don’t you think he might change scriptures slightly and for some to even have the same meaning, just so it can undermine those who know the truth about it all and are trying to reach out and sound God’s warning trumpet.

    Don’t you think Satan may just get a self confessed witch to coin the Mandela Effect so that can also be used to discredit what those jumping up and down trying to save your spiritual life now. Afterall if Satan caused this, the satanists would be the first to know about it!

    Can’t you allow your brain to engineer this backwards with some intelligence and spiritual discernment? If you were Satan and you wanted to change the Bible under the radar what would you do? How would you play your moves? I’m pretty sure with any level of intelligence you would know it would be down slowly and gradually thinking about every way a person might catch onto this and introduce a counter to thwart attempts to make us get through to others.

    So you think Sex in the City is makes more sense but was always and the city. Don’t you think we would have had some headlines about the awards shows getting it wrong time and time again. Have you even watched these kinds of videos where we show residual evidence?

    Interview with A Vampire debunked. Again useless research to go back in history and say all posters are With the vampire. It all changes genius. It would hardly be an arguable effect without it all changing. Otherwise we ourselves would all go oh sorry we looked into the old posters and oopsie we were wrong! Do you even understand what the mandela effect is???

    Don’t you think God is kind enough and loving enough to hold his hand against every shred of evidence being destroyed if what we are saying is true so that we can validate our memories and hold onto what is real?

    Don’t you think if all of reality slowly changes and then one day everybody wakes up to everything all at once changed with a fright, would not be worse than the days of Noah crazy. People would not know what to do. They will certainly be roaming to and fro like in Amos 8:10-11 looking for God’s word, but sorry that is changed completely now. You were all too busy telling us we were wrong to notice.

    Do not bother replying unless you watch the video I have presented. I have watched everything on your page and read everything you wrote. I respect you enough to do that before I respond. I am sick of people replying when they have made no effort to look into the evidence therefore relying on their own understanding on this matter simply saying it’s not true. How many conversations have you had with Jesus over it? Right, near to zero! Again relying on your own understanding.

    The only mind control going on here is what you are falling for believing the lies of these new things in our world. Lying signs and wonders of Satan!!!

    Quite frankly I am getting so tired of telling people. I am getting so weary of caring about all you people who just want to be right. But day in day out God makes me get up in the morning and leads me keep telling people so that your hearts may show Him some flicker of a desire for truth. He obviously loves you bunch of stubborn, righteous, blinded fools. To be honest from my fleshly perspective you are all wearing my patience very thin at this point.

    Let’s face it you are not ready to die for truth. You not even ready to be uncomfortable for truth. It is why you are being sent the delusion in the first place. Imagine if this was true. What would your life look like know that it was? How uncomfortable would it be? It means stability is lost forever! It means you can not trust anything. It means you have to go out and tell a world full of people that would rather sit and watch tv and deny anything is happening. It would mean your family and friends would laugh at you. It means total division and isolation in your life. You are left alone and have nobody but God to rely on. If that is the price for truth do you want it???

    If you do shout yes to God. Ask for it. Show Him you are ready for truth.

    If not, move away from this whole subject and stop making it harder for someone else who might be willing to give up everything for truth. Someone braver than you.

    • Thank you Aaron! That was a beautiful piece! 2 Thessalonians 2:10 “And with all deceivableness of unrighteousness in them that perish; because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved.”
      With all the alterations meant to make us be in fear and doubt and confusion (even in the Bible), this is one verse that jumped out at me one day while reading my Bible. It spoke directly to my heart. I love the truth. Thank you for this wonderful piece and encouraging those of us that do love the truth, even to the point of derision and seclusion. You are even speaking to some of us that need the encouragement to plant our feet even further into the ground of truth. Thank You Father, for Aaron.

  12. I agree the Verse about the Wolf and Lamb being together that did not change.

    I strongly read KJV Bible and very big on the original language the Bible was Written in because there is a point God wants to show in the Different Languages…

    Greek for example is specific to point out something Catholics can’t argue. “Peter, … this rock…” Catholics would say “See, Jesus made Peter the rock…” But if you read the Greek It was clear Jesus was referring to Himself and not Peter because the Greek writing is written as if Jesus was telling Peter, how the church should be structured.

    Other Scriptures says: ‘Jesus the chief cornerstone’ ‘House built on a rock…’ etc. Ties all into place.

    Bottles is not an old English word to be used way back when wine skins are used & more commonly break if used more than once & if so they would break. Bottles could be used more than once. Not wine skins… so

    I study Many a years it was always Wine skins so what happen?

    Because of probable cause is determined to have a chat. When did Bottles come into English?
    Late 1800’s
    is from 1611
    Do the Math.

    Think…is there probable cause for (I before E except after C…but the bears were spelled this way(my teacher hated me for it, I spelled it right) ) Berenstein Bears, Ford, Star Wars – scene that causes disputes, a movie someone made called:

    Are you calling my Testimony a lie?

    “Kazaam” because I wanted to see it and did but was accused of being a racist if I didn’t but was smacked in the middle of the 90’s just being a kid and never saw race as a factor…I knew Sinbad saw his previous film “First Kid” – kept enjoying his acts but still looked at as a racist? Why?
    Now it don’t exist? And Just like that, (snap your fingers) People never looked at me as a racist? So I want to buy a copy of this film because I’m giving Money to a black guy…and that makes me insane?

    Okay…A child who never saw race as an issue accused of being racist with no leg to stand on because there was no proof, evidence, or any affiliation with any radical group…who saw the film because I wanted to…some how a lot of my experiences is what? What Exactly? Igor it, and move on? Battle after battle, argument after argument is what exactly?

    Are you calling my Testimony a lie?

    • John, the wikipedia page you listed for bottle says in the Etymology section: “First attested in English in the 14th century, the word bottle derives from Old French boteille, which comes from vulgar Latin butticula, itself from late Latin buttis meaning “cask”, which is perhaps the latinisation of the Greek βοῦττις (bouttis), “vessel”.


Leave a Reply