This End Times Deception post debunks the Mandela Effect PSYOP, Psychological Operation.
Here is a video that shows how there appears to be changes in the KJV.
It’s war on the minds of believers to get them to doubt the King James, the one version of the Bible that people believe that they can rely on.
People are saying that CERN was used to travel back in time to make the changes, which then caused our current reality to be different.
But if they traveled back in time to make the changes, then everything would have been changed from that point forward, and everyone would have memories based on their changes.
So if they changed the KJV to say ‘bottles’ instead of ‘wineskins’, then everyone would have a memory of bottles.
Don’t you think that the many employees of Chick-Fil-A would have noticed the name change from Chic-Fil-A, and said something about it?
Don’t you think that the many employees and owners of Ford would have noticed that their logo had changed, and said something about it?
Don’t you think that the many employee’s at J.C. Penney would have noticed the name changed from J.C. Penny, and said something about it?
I worked at a Sears for nine years, and our main competition in the mall was J.C. Penney. The name has not been changed.
It seems that the Mandela Effect only effects people who see the information on Facebook and YouTube, because the rest of the world has not noticed.
I will provide some proofs below, but here is how you can prove that the words have not been changed in the King James Bible.
Here is a link to Smith’s Bible Dictionary, which has been used by students of the Bible since its introduction in the 1860’s. Just look up the word that supposedly got changed, and it will show you that it has always been in the King James.
http://www.biblestudytools.com/dictionaries/smiths-bible-dictionary/
Many great theologians have written whole Bible commentaries based on the King James Bible. You can reference their comments that were written from the 16th-19th centuries, which include the words, proving they have not changed.
Here is a link to Matthew Poole’s English Annotations on the Holy Bible, which was written in the 17th century. Look up the passage to see his notes. http://www.studylight.org/commentaries/mpc.html
I also like Adam Clarke Commentary, which was written in the 19th century.
http://www.studylight.org/commentaries/acc.html
They proclaim that the Lord’s Prayer has been changed.
They seem to be confusing Matthew 6:14-15, which is the long version of the Lord’s Prayer; with Luke 6:14, which is the short version. When they look at Matthew 6:14-15, it doesn’t seem to read as their remember.
“For if ye forgive men their trespasses, your heavenly Father will also forgive you: But if ye forgive not men their trespasses, neither will your Father forgive your trespasses.” Matthew 6:14
What they remember is found in Luke 11:4:
“And it came to pass, that, as he was praying in a certain place, when he ceased, one of his disciples said unto him, Lord, teach us to pray, as John also taught his disciples. And he said unto them, When ye pray, say, Our Father which art in heaven, Hallowed be thy name. Thy kingdom come. Thy will be done, as in heaven, so in earth. Give us day by day our daily bread. And forgive us our sins; for we also forgive every one that is indebted to us. And lead us not into temptation; but deliver us from evil.” Luke 11:1-4
When you look at quotes about the Lord’s Prayer, some people substituted the word “trespasses” from Matthew 6:14, to modify Luke 11:4, so that it reads “And forgive us our trespasses; as we also forgive every one that trespasses against us.”
They proclaim that the lion was changed to a wolf, in Isaiah 11:6
That is an association that people have been conditioned with. No doubt many Pastors have said ‘the lion and the lamb’, but the Bible has never said that.
Isaiah 65:25 also says the wold, “The wolf and the lamb shall feed together, and the lion shall eat straw like the bullock: and dust shall be the serpent’s meat. They shall not hurt nor destroy in all my holy mountain, saith the LORD.”
Here’s a manuscript from the Dead Sea Scrolls which proves it out.
Mandela Effect: Lion & Lamb FULLY Debunked with 18 centuries of proof of Isaiah 11:6
If you Google Isaiah 11:6 and look at the images, you see memes like this:
Here’s one that creates the false association. The verse says ‘wolf’, but the image has a ‘lion’.
If you go to Bible Hub and look up that verse, every Bible version says ‘wolf’.
The NIV, NAS, ESV, NKJ, YLT, etc., all say ‘wolf’.
So the Mandela effect would have had to change all Bibles, not just the King James.
Here are Bibles that preceded the King James, which all say ‘wolf’.
The Geneva Bible (1587)
The wolfe also shall dwell with the lambe, and the leopard shall lie with the kid, & the calfe, and the lyon, and the fat beast together, and a litle childe shall leade them.
The Bishop’s Bible (1568)
The Woolfe shall dwell with the Lambe, and the Leoparde shall lye downe by the Goate: Bullockes, Lions, and cattell, shall kepe company together, so that a litle chylde shall leade them.
Miles Coverdale Bible (1535)
The shal ye wolfe dwel with the labe, and the leoparde shal lye downe by the gote. Bullokes, lyons and catel shal kepe company together, so that a litle childe shal dryue them forth.
The Wycliffe Bible (1395)
A wolf schal dwelle with a lombe, and a parde schal reste with a kide; a calf, and a lioun, and a scheep schulen dwelle togidere, and a litil child schal dryue hem.
And here are Bible commentaries from the top theologians of the 16th-19th century, who all speak of the wolf.
Albert Barnes’ Notes on the Bible 19th century
Isaiah 11:6
The wolf. By nature the wolf preys upon the lamb, and the leopard upon the kid, and the adder is venomous, and the bear, and the cow, and the lion, and the ox, cannot live together.
Adam Clarke’s Commentary on the Bible Early 19th century
Isaiah 11:6
The wolf also shall, etc. “Then shall the wolf,” etc. – The idea of the renewal of the golden age, as it is called, is much the same in the Oriental writers with that of the Greeks and Romans: – the wild beasts grow tame; serpents and poisonous herbs become harmless; all is peace and harmony, plenty and happiness: –
Geneva Bible Footnotes 16th century
Isaiah 11:6
The wolf also shall dwell with the lamb, and the leopard shall lie down with the kid; and the calf and the young lion and the fatling together; and a little child shall lead them.
John Gill’s Exposition of the Entire Bible 18th century
Isaiah 11:6
And the wolf also shall dwell with the lamb,
This, and the three following verses Isa 11:7, describe the peaceableness of the Messiah’s kingdom; and which the Targum introduces in this manner,
Matthew Poole’s Commentary on the Holy Bible 17th century
Isaiah 11:6
Ver. 6. The wolf also shall dwell with the lamb, &c.; the creatures shall be restored to that state of innocency in which they were before the fall of man.
These Bibles and commentaries did not get changed. People associate the Lion and the Lamb, because those are descriptions of Messiah. It’s a false association, that was created by Pastors, by songs, by books, etc.
They proclaim that wineskins was changed to bottles in Matthew 9:17.
“Neither do men put new wine into old bottles: else the bottles break, and the wine runneth out, and the bottles perish: but they put new wine into new bottles, and both are preserved.”
The translators of the KJV felt that the word ‘bottles’ fit the description best, as they had used bottles 10 other times and the word bottle 14 times.
Bottles: Joshua 9:4, 9:13, 1 Samuel 25:18, Job 32:19, 38:37, Jeremiah 48:12, Hosea 7:5, Matthew 9:17, Mark 2:22, Luke 5:37, 5:38
Bottle: Genesis 21:14, 21:15, 21:19, Judges 4:19, 1 Samuel 1:24, 10:3, 16:20, 2 Samuel 16:1, Psalms 56:8, 119:83, Jeremiah 13:12, 19:1, 19:10, Habakkuk 2:15
“Smith’s Bible Dictionary” has been used by students of the Bible since its introduction in the 1860’s. For the word ‘bottle‘ is says:
The great leathern bottles are made of the skin of a he-goat, and the small ones, that serve instead of a bottle of water on the road, are made of a kids skin. The effect of external heat upon a skin bottle is indicated in ( Psalms 119:83 ) “a bottle in the smoke,” and of expansion produced by fermentation in ( Matthew 9:17 ) “new wine in old bottles.” Vessels of metal, earthen or glassware for liquids were in use among the Greeks, Egyptians, Etruscans and Assyrians, and also no doubt among the Jews, especially in later times. Thus ( Jeremiah 19:1 ) “a potters earthen bottle.” (Bottles were made by the ancient Egyptians of alabaster, gold, ivory and stone. They were of most exquisite workmanship and elegant forms. Tear-bottles were small urns of glass or pottery, made to contain the tears of mourners at funerals, and placed in the sepulchres at Rome and in Palestine. In some ancient tombs they are found in great numbers. ( Psalms 56:8 ) refers to this custom.–ED.)
The following esteemed theologians who wrote King James Bible commentaries during the 17th-19th centuries, all describe the use of the word ‘bottles’.
Albert Barnes’ Notes on the New and Old Testaments.
John Calvin’s Commentaries.
Adam Clarke’s Commentary on the Bible.
Commentary from the 1599 edition of the Geneva Bible.
John Gill’s Exposition of the Entire Bible.
Jamieson-Fausset-Brown Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible.
Matthew Henry’s Whole Bible Commentary.
Matthew Poole’s Commentary on the Holy Bible.
John Wesley’s Bible Notes.
Every modern Bible uses the word bottles, instead of wineskins as used in the King James.
Most pastors do not use the King James due to archaic language, so they no doubt have repeatedly used the word wineskins, which created the association in people’s minds.
They proclaim that the word ‘tires‘ was inserted into Ezekiel 24:23
“And your tires shall be upon your heads, and your shoes upon your feet: ye shall not mourn nor weep; but ye shall pine away for your iniquities, and mourn one toward another.”
“Smith’s Bible Dictionary” has been used by students of the Bible since its introduction in the 1860′. For the word ‘tire‘ it says:
an old English word for headdress. It was an ornamental headdress worn on festive occasions, ( Ezekiel 24:17 Ezekiel 24:23 ) and perhaps, as some suppose, also an ornament for the neck worn by both women, ( Isaiah 3:18 ) and men, and even on the necks of camels. ( Judges 8:21 Judges 8:26 )
John Gill, a biblical scholar in the 18th century, wrote a whole Bible commentary on the King James called John Gill’s Exposition of the Entire Bible. For Ezekiel 24:23 he confirms that is says tires.
“And your tires shall be upon your heads, and your shoes upon your feet. As will be necessary while travelling, and when carrying captive to a foreign country, as now will be their case:“
It’s not talking about car tires, but an ornamental headdress that people wore on their head.
They proclaim that Messiah has been changed from being the ‘cornerstone‘ to the ‘head of the corner‘.
Once again, it’s just ignorance of other Scriptures which declare that Messiah is the cornerstone, which causes them to believe that 1 Peter 2:7 has been changed.
which be disobedient, the stone which the builders disallowed, the same is made the head of the corner,
In the previous verse, 1 Peter 2:6, Peter declares that Messiah is the corner stone.
Wherefore also it is contained in the scripture, Behold, I lay in Sion a chief corner stone, elect, precious: and he that believeth on him shall not be confounded.
The Scriptures still declared that Messiah is the cornerstone.
Jesus saith unto them, Did ye never read in the scriptures, The stone which the builders rejected, the same is become the head of the corner: this is the Lord’s doing, and it is marvellous in our eyes? Matthew 21:42
And have ye not read this scripture; The stone which the builders rejected is become the head of the corner: Mark 12:10
And he beheld them, and said, What is this then that is written, The stone which the builders rejected, the same is become the head of the corner? Luke 20:17
This is the stone which was set at nought of you builders, which is become the head of the corner. Acts 4:11
For the king knoweth of these things, before whom also I speak freely: for I am persuaded that none of these things are hidden from him; for this thing was not done in a corner. Acts 26:26
And are built upon the foundation of the apostles and prophets, Jesus Christ himself being the chief corner stone; Ephesians 2:20
1 Peter 2:7 was not changed. Peter had just provided another way to say it, as he had already said ‘corner stone’ in the previous verse.
They proclaim that Luke 17:34-35 said ‘two people’ would be in the same bed, not two men.
I tell you, in that night there shall be two men in one bed; the one shall be taken, and the other shall be left.
Two women shall be grinding together; the one shall be taken, and the other left.
The context of the passage is not about Messiah teaching against sexual perversion. He was simply naming times when two people would be together, in similar circumstances; one taken, one not.
In our privileged world we think that the only reason two men would be in the same bed is for sexual perversion. Go live in a poor country and you will see that they sleep in the same bed. In a situation where many people have to live in the same house, should a man and woman who aren’t married sleep in the same bed? No! The men should sleep in the same bed, to ‘prevent‘ sexual problems.
They proclaim that Luke 17:35 used to say that two women were grinding at the mill, but now are just grinding, which they say is a perversion.
Luke 17:35 never had the word mill, but Matthew 24:41 does, “Two women shall be grinding at the mill; the one shall be taken, and the other left.”
Just another case of people not doing their homework to see that one Gospel has the word mill, thus the association; which they think has been changed in Luke. The word mill was never in Luke, so nothing has been changed.
The two women ground together because it took both of them to operate the hand mill, as one could not do it alone.
People proclaim that Exodus 13:12 used to say ‘womb’, but now says ‘matrix’.
“That thou shalt set apart unto the LORD all that openeth the matrix, and every firstling that cometh of a beast which thou hast; the males shall be the LORD’S.”
They are thinking of Exodus 13:2, which says “Sanctify unto me all the firstborn, whatsoever openeth the womb among the children of Israel, both of man and of beast: it is mine.“
So it’s just a matter of confusion between the two verses, which have never changed.
They claim that Peanuts writer Charles M. Schulz’s name used to be Schultz.
I grew up loving Snoopy! His name was never Schultz, that is just an association that people have because that name is more common. People hear Schulz and just assume that it’s spelled Schultz.
Don’t you think that his family would have noticed the name change and said something?
Does it really seem plausible that CERN changed every newspaper that was ever printed which featured his comic strip? And all of the merchandise was changed too? I think not!
Here are links to images of Charles Schulz’s star on the Hollywood Walk of Fame.
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/21/Schulz_star.jpg/800px-Schulz_star.jpg
Charles M. Schulz Highland Arena on Snelling Avenue and Ford Parkway in Saint Paul, Minnesota. https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/5/58/Charles_M._Schulz_Highland_Arena.JPG
And his Congressional Gold Medal
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/13/Charles_Schulz_Congressional_Gold_Medal_obverse.jpg
Here is a testimony from Ryan James who had originally proclaimed that the Mandela Effect was true. He follows it with proofs that it is not true.
I’m burdened to share with you what all I’ve learned since posting about the Mandela Effect last Saturday night. I must say again that I’m terribly sorry for posting about this without examining it further. Like many, I was beyond shocked to see a Scripture that I had known for years was not the way I thought it was in the KJV Bible. I felt like a spell had been cast or somehow history was changed.
After further examination, time with God, and fellowship with trusted brethren, I must say that I do believe this is all a demonic PSYOP to make many question God’s Holy Word, question their sanity, and also to discredit the truth movement.
What they have done is they took many things that the masses thought were true and used it against us to make us think it actually was and that we are somehow living in another reality.
I’m going to debunk each and every example that I posted with hopes that the ones that still believe in this will not give into this deception any longer. This is deep psychological warfare and we need to be aware of Satan’s devices.
Example 1 Debunked- Matthew 7:1 is a verse that many, including myself thought was, “Judge not, lest ye be judged..” and the KJV states that it’s “Judge not, that ye be not judged.” Now, to begin with, the meaning is the exact same. If Satan was going to try to change God’s Word, he wouldn’t change a verse to mean the exact same thing. It just doesn’t make sense. Yes, the serpent is subtle, but his changes would effect the meaning of a verse or passage. When Paul Washer quoted Judge not, lest ye be judged…”, he wasn’t quoting it from his Bible. It he was, then yes, RED FLAG. But that’s not the case. You can go online and see time and time again that Matthew 7:1 in the KJV has always been “Judge not, that ye be not judged.” Many people, including myself thought that “lest ye be judged” came from the KJV because it’s Old English or Shakespearean if you will, but it did not. The Orthodox Jewish Bible does state the misquote of Matthew 7:1 the way we thought it was. When people repeat things over and over, you will in fact believe it is true. It never came out of the KJV from what I can gather, it’s just highly misquoted.
Example 2 Debunked- Matthew 9:17 has the word “bottles” instead of “wineskins.” Again, this doesn’t change the meaning of this verse the slightest bit. It seems as though every other version of the Bible says “wineskins” and it’s been repeated and preached so much that there’s no reason to believe it doesn’t say “wineskins.” Apparently the translators of the KJV thought “bottles” fit the Scriptures best as in comparison to “wineskins.” You can go on You Tube and see for yourself many preachers reading “bottles” out of the KJV. God’s Word will always stand. If changes are made to the Bible, scholars of the Word of God would gather and have the correct one printed in days.
Example 3 Debunked- “Sex and the City” used to be “Sex in the City.” Not true. Although, “Sex in the City” makes much more sense, it’s been misspoken time and time again, even in newspaper articles and promotions. It’s always been “Sex and the City.” Subconsciously, “Sex in the City” sounds much better. Our memories are still in tact guys. You want to know the truth? Call up the producers or cast members or die hard fans.
Example 4 Debunked- Mr. Rogers Neighborhood Theme Song “It’s a beautiful day in this neighborhood” is a highly misquoted song lyric. Many say, “It’s a beautiful day in THE neighborhood” instead of “THIS.” It’s been repeated wrong in movies, TV shows, and because “the” sounds better than “this” in our subconscious, we say it wrong thinking it’s the right lyric. Ask anyone that worked on the show. It’s always been “this” and not “the”.
Example 5 Debunked- This one freaked me out a bit and it’s the fact the movie “Interview with the Vampire” is misquoted often as “Interview with A Vampire.” It’s another one of those things that makes much more sense in our subconscious, so we say it thinking its correct. You can look back at old interviews and posters and promotions and it’s always been “Interview with THE Vampire.” Humans tend to say what makes sense the most. It’s been misquoted on TV and magazines and people that see that think it’s the correct title, when it’s not.
Example 6 Debunked- this one is easier to explain. The movie “Snow White and the 7 dwarfs” has a famous quote, “Magic Mirror on the wall, who is the fairest one of them all?” The masses believe it’s “”Mirror, Mirror on the wall” instead because if you go back to the actual children’s book of “Snow White” it’s quoted “Mirror, Mirror.” Generally, plays and musicals will go by what the book says rather than the movie itself and that’s why you hear the quote, “Mirror, Mirror on the wall” all of the time. It was actually used. Just not in the movie.
Example 7 Debunked- This one is also easily explained and it’s the fact many believe that “Berenstain Bears” used to be spelled “Berenstein Bears.” Not true. Here’s why. The publishers of “Berenstain Bears” didn’t sign onto many other books, plays, posters, toys, advertisements, etc. with the spelling of “Berenstein Bears.” You did actually see It spelled like you might remember it, but it wasn’t on the official books. It’s another one of those things that sounds better, so your subconscious went right along with it.
Example 8 Debunked- “Looney Tunes” is not “Looney Toons” although it looks so much better. It’s yet another subconscious mind trick. “Toons” is short for “cartoon”, so of course you would think its “Toons” and not “Tunes”. Not the case. You may have thought it was “Toons” because there were shows like “Tiny Toons Adventures” that had it spelled the other way.
Example 9 Debunked- This one got me pretty good. It’s from Star Wars Episode 5 where Darth Vader says to Luke, “No, I am your father.” It’s been repeated “Luke, I am your father” in movies, TV shows, advertisements, t-shirts, and all sorts of others things. There’s been articles about this misquote for many years. Even the biggest Star Wars fans get it wrong. It’s yet another subconscious mind trick. Someone said it, the masses caught on, and the rest is history.
Note: The original film came out in 1977 a time before the internet and everybody remembers the original line which says “Luke I am your father“. Fast forward to current times and you will find that the film has been remastered and re-release on DVD; it is on this current version that it now says “No I am your father“.
Example 10 Debunked- The TV commercial for Sara Lee goes “Nobody doesn’t like Sara Lee.” But that doesn’t make sense, right? That is exactly why we think it’s “Nobody does it like Sara Lee.” It’s not correct. People have been misquoting this for dozens of years. You can just do a quick Google search and see that it’s one of the most misquoted slogans of all time. Satan knew it and he used it for his advantage.
Well guys, it’s been a tough 3-4 days for me. I barely slept Saturday evening and Sunday at work, I felt like I stepped into the Matrix. But suddenly, people like Joshua Busby and others were coming up with resources debunking mistruths and at first, I was a little upset because I was convinced it was true. But when I woke up on Monday morning, the Holy Spirit told me that this is all a lie.
I began researching and looking over God’s Word again and concluded that I had been tricked. This is the type of mind tricks that magicians and mediums will do to freak your mind out. It’s pure psychological trickery. Nobody went back in time and changed anything. God’s Word hasn’t changed. Rest easy friends.
Please, do not tie this PSYOP to other conspiracies that people in the truth movement present. It’s illogical and misleading. Most of this world is blind and deceived by indoctrination and what they see on the Tell-lie-vision and mainstream media outlets. Truthers are going to be wrong about things. We are human. It’s when truthers refuse to admit they as wrong that causes problems.
I URGE YOU GUYS WITH ALL SINCERITY >>DO NOT PUSH THIS PSYOP<< People will discredit you and shut everything you said in the past off as “conspiracy” instead of truth. I want this post to edify and reprove anyone that is still thinking the Word of God had changed. It hasn’t! It’s the SAME. I love you guys.
Go to Chuck Missler commentary video youtube on Rev I and you will see KJV verses 12 & 13 use lampstands but apparently it has always been candlesticks i cant explain this one
I feel sorry for people who can not see that the bible has been changed in many places. They often say God’s word can’t be changed. I once felt that way. But then God dealt with me and showed me that He himself told us that it would be changed. He told us to write in on our hearts, why, He knew it would be changed.
He also warned of the terrible punishment for those who changed or manipulated His word. There, in that very scripture He told us that it would be changed, that there would be punishment for it. There is no punishment for something that will not happen….
So we know that it is going to be changed.. in fact it has changed many times through translation. That is why, if you understand this you read a pre 1611 KJV bible. That was the last bible that was not significantly changed through translation of the kings court and others.
There were no banks for example in Jesus time… thus the turning over of the money changers inside the temple… actual banks did not come into being until much later in history. but yet the scripture was changed to say banks.. this is just one example…
The most terrible to me was the scripture where they try to say that Jesus told them to bring the nay sayers in front of Him and he would slay them… Jesus never said this… I have read this book and verses many times and He never said this… quite the opposite Jesus taught love thine enemies, turn the other cheek etc…. this was a blatant attempt to show Jesus as a murderer.
For one to set here and argue that many of these scriptures have not changed is just wrong… it is disinfo at it’s greatest. they did not have bottles.. there were no bottles, there were wine skins and pots…. they were not making glass bottles with tops on them in the days of Jesus down at the wine vineyard lol…
This is not just a translation, this is a change. Just like the movie snow white, we just watched this movie a month or so ago and for us it had not changed… we had many people watching and we even watched the old original vhs with the kids… both of them said mirror mirror…. then later they both changed to magic mirror… this is not hocus pocus or hypnotism… this actually changed.. just like the bernstein bears… and the old products stickers who show it correctly…
what i don’t get it why would you want to keep the devils agenda.. that is what you are doing. you are steering people to the devil by telling them it is not so and what God told us, that it would be changed, is not and has not happened.
You are so so wrong… people, it has changed… it is not over… more changes occur every day… it will not stop… read as much as you can while you still have the word… put it on your heart so it is written there and can’t be changed. don’t listen to this false prophet telling you the opposite of what God tells us… look up scripture yourself… God does warn what he will do to people who change His word… he does that because He knows it will be changed….
Listen now… don’t be left behind by people like this telling you it is all ok… it is not…
the bot
The changes have been made, and many people do not care, are too asleep, or it is too traumatizing to accept it. God does not change.
God does not change, and neither does His Word.
So you are seriously telling me that the Bible always said bottles instead of wineskins? If that is your claim, than my friend, you are a liar.
I just offered you proof from third-party sources. If I’m wrong, I’m deceived, not a liar. Learn the difference!
Yes David you are devised. Gods word has not changed, it is written in all the hearts of the people that have recognized the change to written word in their bible. You have no foundation and are drifting with the current. Our you are a wolf in sheep’s clothing, just I have said before.
Tom V.
http://wearechristiansoldiers.com/
Well Tom, you can think what you like. There’s bigger deceptions going on in this world than the Mandela Effect. Christians have been deceived by the enemy about prophecy fulfillment, so that they don’t even know who the antichrist is, what the mark of the beast is, where we are at on the Revelation fulfillment timeline, and what will happen next as we await Messiah return. http://revelationtimelinedecoded.com/
I have studied the Bible for over 20 years and have never, once, seen the word “bottle” in any translation. The reason is they did not have bottles 2,000 years ago. Wine was stored in wine skins as these could be made airtight – not so with pottery jugs.
Are you saying that you only read the King James Bible for over 20 years? Every English Bible version other than the King James uses the word ‘wineskin’.
The King James translators choose a word that was relevant in the 16th-17th century.
25 verses in the King James use the word bottle. http://www.studylight.org/desk/index.cgi?sr=1&old_q=btoole&search_form_type=general&q1=bottle&s=0&t1=en_kjv&ns=0
I could have (and should have) commented sooner. And “Yes” I will give some credence to your ongoing arguments David. I have only once in my life responded to ANY show or publication; and that was just recently when this Mandela Effect began to take hold and I spent so much time looking into it. Here is my response.
I’m a 52 year old father of four. I’ve spent my entire life raised in church, and thousands of hours inside the Bible. My only version of the Bible for 28 years was a Jack Van Impie edition of the King James, given to me by my father. (1976) As it literally fell apart in the binding, I only saved the ‘cyclopedic index’ for future use. (60,000 listings) There was NEVER a different version I ever carried or read out of.
My life circumstance (separate from my time in church) put me in a unique position to thoroughly study a lot of the Old Testament. I forged my own tools to study with, and painstakingly applied my time and approach to understanding God’s Word. Although my short term memory (attention?) to any subject gets digested slowly; my only claim to fame is in my organization. Spend enough time moving it around, and a better way of organizing becomes intuitive. AT this God has made me really good.
You have taken the words right out of my mouth several times in stating the agendas that are staring us in the face. My first thought in regard to the Mandela Effect was what I initially thought was the common thread. That is, every effect is controlled digitally. This quickly fell away as we saw the maps change as well as the Bible in it’s printed editions.
Calculating the possibilities of all matter, and PRODUCING the possibilities is entirely two different things. (Think D Wave) There is some physical part of the apparatus not being disclosed. One TRUE reality remains: This can not be an overlapping dimension, many of these word changes do not relate to ANY reality. (unless some form of chaos is present and accepted somewhere in infinity?)
The simplest explanation is also the most obvious. Aside from the slight of hand changes that seem to prevail in the secular world, what is under attack? The King James Version of the Holy Bible. God’s Word.
1) The Book of Luke particularly. (Lucas as some have found)
2) The Bible’s Sensibility is Compromised.
3) The Insertion of Vulgar Themes.
a) Arabic?
b)Transgender
c) New (Old) World Order. (satanic side)
4) Even common words once found in the Bible’s narrative are now misapplied randomly littering the Truth. This work has been Sliced and Diced.
Drop an S, Change from A to The, Color or Reshape a Logo, no big deal. You can only be curiously amused. Multiple changes to the Source of Truth, and you have Death by a Thousand Cuts! As mentioned above these are simply the facts.
The Obvious part lies in the “Pool of Reality” which is being drawn on by whatever mechanism. The Millennia of Falsehoods Styled and Delivered as Lies, Deceptions, False Flags, Fake Reality News, Hidden Agendas that are consumed with All Things Adversarial to the Redemptive work of our Father in Heaven. Where were peoples hearts all these years? This is now being Uncovered. It truly does seem that there is no longer any where to hide. We either have to Embrace the Truth Set in Creation or Lose it!
To finish some thoughts above. I DID study from only the KJV. Although there were times other translations were used by speakers to teach with, more than not, an extended explanation was given to the “Differences” between these translations while they were speaking.
There are now possibly over 200 changes in the KJV, of which, the most mundane words are used ‘Unintelligibly’ and more frequently than before.
A few examples of the most glaring lie in the fact that even if the translators used words they had common to their day, the “English” rendition doesn’t now make as much sense. ie…
1) Why bottles? They Don’t Break. Nothing would be spilled and the wine would only get Better! (almost every other translation understood this)
2)Corn of Wheat. This phrase was NEVER used for the many years I had my Bible. There would need to be an explanation along with the translation, that I and others have never had to have explained. Corn is now used over 100 times in the KJV Bible. I have binders full of notes and graphs. I developed my own hand written database. Compiled Themes. Spent thousand’s of hours. Corn wasn’t in my Bible.
These are the examples most used in this thread. Although many have never seen it differently, we do have a conflict.
One very interesting secular investigation conducted by a man looking into the “Jiffy” peanut butter brand took him to California. There, he found 15 different restaurants with “Jiffy Burgers ” on their menu. One sign even had the iconic jar with hands and feet drawn on it as I remember as a kid. He then went on to call each of the restaurants to ask what kind of peanut butter was being served on the burger. Several actually said Jiffy. These business’ had been serving this product for “YEARS”. Why the name? Why the icon? The menu with the jar animated into a personality had been there since the place had opened.
The changes in the Bible (KJV) are certainly more serious if true. An exhaustive list of possibilities is being documented at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DRcLgzVHKfs
She has so many more questions compiled into videos. Although some things do have an explanation in this series, so many more do not.
Thanks James!
extol is a witch, believe her at your own peril
There have been no changes to the KJV
I would think people would see this by the very fact that all she does is try to convince people of her deception, instead of trying to convince people of the good news of Christ the Lord.
IF you are one of those who can’t see through her, then you are in serious trouble with the Lord, and better worry about getting that right first.
This is not correct. Any true born again believer ask and God reveals truth. I have the gift of discernment, and often the gift of knowing also. Scripture HAS changed. In the beginning God created the HEAVENS (not heaven singular) Genesis 1 KJV. Much more scripture changed. The fact that it is in history now, is exactly what people are trying to say. Changed occured that always was and is the new now. The word must be written in your heart for you believers to see. I am not a liar and clearly remember old wineskins was how KJV was written. I clearly remember even a sermon discussing the heavenS by a pastor who recommended KJV more than other versions. This pastor has passed away (Chuck Smith of Calvary Chapel). I found this it is not the same sermon, though even the scripture is referenced a few times and is written correctly, and the link now says it incorrectly KJV: blueletterbible.org Chuck Smith C2000_gen https://www.blueletterbible.org/comm/smith_chuck/c2000_gen/gen_001a.cfm
Chuck Smith site: thewordfortoday.org
Thy word have I hid in mine heart, that I might not sin against thee. Psalms 119:11
Please read: Daniel 23-27 We are living in end times.
23 Thus he said, The fourth beast shall be the fourth kingdom upon earth, which shall be diverse from all kingdoms, and shall devour the whole earth, and shall tread it down, and break it in pieces.
24 And the ten horns out of this kingdom are ten kings that shall arise: and another shall rise after them; and he shall be diverse from the first, and he shall subdue three kings.
25 And he shall speak great words against the most High, and shall wear out the saints of the most High, and think to change times and laws: and they shall be given into his hand until a time and times and the dividing of time.
26 But the judgment shall sit, and they shall take away his dominion, to consume and to destroy it unto the end.
27 And the kingdom and dominion, and the greatness of the kingdom under the whole heaven, shall be given to the people of the saints of the most High, whose kingdom is an everlasting kingdom, and all dominions shall serve and obey him.
28 Hitherto is the end of the matter. As for me Daniel, my cogitations much troubled me, and my countenance changed in me: but I kept the matter in my heart. KJV
You are the one conducting a psyop. Obviously you weren’t alive in the late 80’s or early 90’s or you didn’t have kids but the Berenstein Bears were spelled just like that. I had the books, read the books. I know how they were spelled. I don’t give a shit what you think things are changing before our eyes. As for the lion laying down with the lamb, you are wrong again. The scripture always said that. Why would people make such a big deal about it if they didn’t remember something different? And why would pastors preach a scripture that has no basis in reality, according to you? Rev 5:5-6 the lion of the tribe of Judah, the root of David, Hath prevailed to open the book, and to loose the seven seals thereof. And I beheld, in the midst of the throne, and of the four beasts, and of the elders, stood a lamb. So it has always been the lion and the lamb. These are strange times we are living in. You are dealing with people who are heavily into the occult, and trying to destroy Gods word and usher in the beast system at all costs. When CERN was opened, they opened it with what could only be described as a luciferian ceremony. Look it up. It’s time to wake up and take the red pill and accept the possibility that powerful supernatural forces are at work
WAKE UP !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
SO MANY OF US HAVE HAD THE SAME BIBLES FOR A LONG TIME!!!!!!!!
AND YOUR TELLING ME THAT ALL OF US HAVE MEMORY ISSUES? NO YOU ARE ASLEEP
Yes Tammy, they are asleep.
Nobody thought that LOONEY TUNES had ever been LOONEY TOONS until after the release of a film called WHO FRAMED ROGER RABBIT?, whose cartoon characters lived in a place called “Toontown” and were called “toons” by the human characters.
I love you to bro. Thanks for making me rest easy. But why do the Peanuts related stuff say Schulz instead of Schultz? I’m sure I’ve seen it the other way. I even know a guy who says his aunt knew him personally.
Yeah, the supposed Mandela Effect is really messing with some people’s minds. I loved Snoopy! His name was never Schultz, that is just an association that people have because that name is more common. People hear Schulz and just assume that it’s spelled Schultz.
Don’t you think that his family would have noticed the name change and said something?
That guy’s aunt may of known him personally, but that doesn’t mean that she knew how to spell his name correctly.
Does it really seem plausible that CERN changed every newspaper that was ever printed which featured his comic strip? And all of the merchandise was changed too? I think not!
Here are links to images of Charles Schulz’s star on the Hollywood Walk of Fame.
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/21/Schulz_star.jpg/800px-Schulz_star.jpg
Charles M. Schulz Highland Arena on Snelling Avenue and Ford Parkway in Saint Paul, Minnesota. https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/5/58/Charles_M._Schulz_Highland_Arena.JPG
And his Congressional Gold Medal
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/13/Charles_Schulz_Congressional_Gold_Medal_obverse.jpg
That is the point. The changes always were. I have a visual type of memory and I clearly remember a t in Schultz. Schulz is pronounced the same as Schultz. I thought his name was changed for some unknown reason before I learned more about the mandela effect, then I almost went along with the fact that Schulz is pronounced the same and the comic strips and my old vintage book. Though, it is still the wrong spelling of his name I know it.
The change is Time and History, not on products. Once this is understood, people can choose the truth or go along with the changes (the deception). (Daniel. 7:25) This is the work of an evil spirit and dominion. The antichrist spirit is here.
Makes you wonder why the Schulz family doesn’t protest that their name has been changed. I know I would be upset about that.
That’s the point David, the changes ALWAYS were! It’s a different reality and it only affects like 40% of the population. In one person’s timeline it’s Schultz, in the other’s it’s Schulz. They don’t protest the name change because from their perspective it never changed. There are an infinite number of universes, people suffering from the Mandela Effect are from one and are now in another. What they see as changes 60% of everybody else sees it at always was.
“the changes ALWAYS were!” Really? If your reality always was Chic-Fil-A, then there was no change. We can all go to Chick-Fil-A right now and see the same name. If 40% of people were in a different reality, then they would still see Chic-Fil-A. Filter the fluoride out of your water people!
David, actually if the name of chic-fil-a was changed there would not be any record of chic-fil-a because it was changed and no longer exist as that name in this time line. The people having the M effect remember the name of the restaurant before the reality was changed somehow. Nobody is contesting how the place is called now or that the staff or ceo would only know it as the current name only. What people are saying is that they remember the original name before that reality was changed. It is not confusion or bad memory. I believe these little slips where made so that when the true deception, the changing of the bible starts that people will accept it as bad memory.
That really doesn’t make sense Karina. If they changed the name and there was no record of it, then nobody would know that the name had changed. And you can’t tell me that out of the many thousands of people who have worked at Chick-Fil-A, that none of them would be the type who would be able to remember the old name.
A “just an association” mistake David, please. Tell me again how old you are? Tell us a little about yourself, schooling, membership groups (Masons maybe), tell us about your greatest accomplishment for the Kingdom of God, lets us all examine your fruit. The Bible says we shall know them by their fruit. You tell me one of yours and I will tell you one of mine, you go first. Lets go back and forth say 5 stories to start. Are you up to the challenge?
Tom Valdez
To find out about me, read the about page on this website. Read the home page to find out the truth about prophecy fulfillment.
Read my study series on the Falling Away of 2 Thessalonians 2: http://christianitybeliefs.org/the-falling-away/
Read my study series on Islam In Bible Prophecy: http://christianitybeliefs.org/islam-in-bible-prophecy/
Read my study series on the fulfillment of the 70th week of Daniel: http://70thweekofdaniel.com/
Read my study series on the fulfillment of Revelation, including where we are at on the fulfillment timeline and what will happen next as we await Messiah’s glorious return: http://revelationtimelinedecoded.com/
Are you up for the challenge?
I believe I was talking about your fruit, not your writings. Who have you personally helped? No names need to be relieved. When have you personally defended the word in this world, in person? Tell us about how the spirit of God has used you in the real world, not on your website. I have found that those that stand and proclaim they are all knowing of the word of God have never gotten their hands dirty working in the field. You look down at all that would dare question your perception. I believe that the reference to wolf in sheep’s clothing is still in the bible.
“Beware of false prophets, who come to you in sheep’s clothing but inwardly are ravenous wolves. You will know them by their fruits. Are grapes gathered from thorns, or figs from thistles? So, every sound tree bears good fruit, but the bad tree bears evil fruit. A sound tree cannot bear evil fruit, nor can a bad tree bear good fruit. Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire. Thus you will know them by their fruits. “Not every one who says to Me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ shall enter the kingdom of heaven, but he who does the will of My Father Who is in heaven. On that day many will say to Me, ‘Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in Your Name, and cast out demons in Your Name, and do many mighty works in Your Name? And then will I declare to them, ‘I never knew you; depart from Me, you evildoers.” Matthew 7:15-23
My websites show my fruit and they show that the Spirit is guiding me. You cite a verse about false prophets, which is ironic, because my studies prove that there are many false prophecy teachers in the church today. Exposing the supposed Mandela Effect has nothing to do with being a false prophet, as it’s not about Bible prophecy.
I don’t need to justify my personal life to you. What I say on this article is either true or not. Defending the truth is not looking down on people and it’s not judging people. I have posted your comments, you are welcome to disagree with mine.
I want to be sure as well, and I am praying about this daily, when I read your story, I see snoring, deep sleep, is this a way the devil has justified these things in our snoring believers, WAKE UP
Lord let the words of my mouth and the meditation of my heart be acceptable in your sight oh Lord
I any word i have spoken isn’t the truth reveal it to me! amen
NO COMMENTS?
God is taking away his word. The Bible NOW says Jesus is NOT the one who is, the one who was, and the one that is to come, it says He is only a witness. And whoever this new Lord is, is telling them to behead people with a sword Amos 9:1 (that is the Antichrist) The KJV has been supernaturally changed(so has the Torah), possibly by CERN. God said He would take away His word in the book of Amos 8:11-12 Do a search for Mandela Effect Bible. I went through the book of Revelation and here is what I found:
Rev 1:4-5 says….Grace be unto you, and peace, from him which is, and which was, and which is to come (which we know is Jesus) but then it says, and from Jesus Christ who is the faithful witness? Jesus is no longer the one who is, and who was, and who is to come? Then who is? Who is this unnamed Messiah? Are they setting it up for the Antichrist? They switched out WHO with WHICH also.
Does anyone remember the four beasts in the book of Revelation having harps? Rev 5:8-9 It says not only the 24 elders had harps but the 4 beasts had them too. I don’t think so. The beasts and the 24 elders are saying they were redeemed because of Jesus. Beasts were redeemed? Rev 5:14 The four beasts said Amen? Rev 6:6 Penny? Rev 14:2 I heard a voice of harpers harping with their harps? I don’t recall ever reading that before.
Rev 14:8 An angel declaring Babylon has fallen? I remember it being in Rev 18? Oh wait, it is there too at Rev 18:2? In Rev 14:18 Another angel came out from the altar, which had power over fire? Doesn’t even fit into the scripture. Rev 15:7 ONE of the four BEASTS gives the seven angels 7 vials full of the wrath of God?
Rev 16:5 the angel of the waters? Previous was an angel that had power over fire and now we have an angel of the waters? Rev 16:15 is out of place and does not make sense with Rev 16:14,16. Jesus tells them to keep their garments so they don’t walk naked and then He gathers them together in Armageddon?
Revelation 17:9 And here is a mind that hath wisdom? Then it tells about something totally different than what I remember, that should go with the counting of the number of the beast and his number is 666 which is in Rev 13:18. Rev 18:3 waxed? Rev 18:20 holy apostles and prophets?
Rev 19:9 and he saith unto me? who says unto him? Rev 19:10 He said not to fall at his feet and worship him? who is he? Another unnamed being. Rev 21:17…according to the measure of man, that is, of the angel?
I have read Revelation so many times over the years, it is the book I have spent the most time in. It is very different, things added, things taken away, and things out of place.
I just caught some more. Revelation 15:6 And the seven angels came out of the temple? But Revelation 21:22 tells us there is no need of a temple for God and the Lamb are the temple.
It just occurred to me, the messed up verse in Rev 16:14-16 it talks about Armageddon and in the middle it adds a verse too keep your garments so you don’t walk naked. These were never there but isn’t it interesting that they put that in the middle of the Armageddon verse. That is exactly who God will gather to the battle of Armageddon the ones without their garments.that are naked. The ones that will be with God are the ones who have washed their ROBES and made them white in the blood of the Lamb. It has to be demons doing this. They are mocking and messing things up but they also seem to know the plan of how it is going to go. Also it is ROBES not GARMENTS. The Tribulation is coming, The Antichrist is coming, God’s wrath is coming. LYING signs and wonders are coming.
Also, Fight the Armies of the Aliens in the Bible? Hebrews 11:34
Amos 9:1 I saw the LORD standing upon the altar: and he said, Smite the lintel of the door, that the posts may shake: and cut them in the head, all of them; and I will slay the last of them with the sword:…..??? This doesn’t sound like Jesus, the Bible used to say this was the Antichrist.
Luke 19:27 But those mine enemies, which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me. Do you all remember this? Do you think this is the Lord? or do you think this is the Antichrist? Please wake up Church, you should know the Lord and His word. This is not it.
God’s word is no longer the Bible. Feel free to copy and paste this as much as you like so people are not deceived. In the book of Amos 8:11-12 God said He would take away His word. God’s hand of protection is off the Bible, severe times are coming.
It looks like they have taken over the Bible to set it up for the one world religion of the antichrist. They have technology you are not aware of.
Kathy, none of the points that you made have anything to do with the Word of God being changed by thesupposed Mandela Effect. Just because you don’t remember something or don’t understand a passage, doesn’t mean that it’s been changed. I don’t have to time to address all of your mistaken points. Try reading the Bible Study comments from Matthew Poole’s English Annotations on the Holy Bible, which are based on the King James and written in the 17th century. http://www.studylight.org/commentaries/mpc.html
There is no sense in arguing with each other about whether there are changes in the bible or anywhere else for that matter, the fundamental nature of this phenomenon is that those who are experiencing these shifts in reality are actually experiencing them, things are changing, it’s perplexing and they are telling the truth.
For those who are not experiencing any changes in reality and have no memories of things being different actually do not see anything. For them, nothing has changed or altered and it’s perplexing that others are experiencing changes. They are also telling the truth.
So, you see there is no right or wrong, there are no winners or losers in this ‘debate’ It is just the way it is and the way it is meant to be. Think of it as a wonderful wake-up call for some, a shift in consciousness and awareness. For others, there is no reason to awaken and consciousness will remain as it is.
Belle, your statement is based on people’s memories and associations, but the fact is that many of these things can be proved to have not changed. Show me a Chick-Fil-A manager who is complaining about the supposed name change. Show me a Ford Dealership owner who is complaining about the supposed logo change. There are none, because those things did not happen!
As for the Bible verses, it all about association. Pastors have helped created the associations, such as with the lion and the lamb, but the KJV has always said wolf.
Look up Bible commentaries for the great theologians of the 16th-19th century, which are all based on the KJV, and they cite the wolf in that passage. There is no way that CERN changed physical Bibles and changed every commentary about that passage.
So there is right and there is wrong. This is the work of sorcery designed to deceive believers, by manipulating their false association.
Sorry David, but you are just a deceiver. “sorcery” David? Please.. Everything we see that has changed to you it is just “sorcery”. You are a liar just like your father, the Devil (Lucifer). One day David, one day this will blow up in your face. A lie always does. You stand with the rulers of this age and their fate will be your fate.
Tom
So you’re saying that not one point that I’ve made on this explanation makes any sense? That’s the problem with ya’ll, you can’t admit one point. Do me a favor. Go talk to the manager at the local Chick-Fil-A tomorrow and ask them if the spelling of their name changed. Then go to JCPenney and do the same. Then came back and honestly tell me what you found out.
Try reading Revelation 18:23 which states that the enemy has deceived the world by sorcery.
I wasn’t able to finish reading the whole article but will as time allows. Two quick points: a Christian pastor, with very solid credentials, brought this topic to our attention, not YouTube nor Facebook. When he did, I grabbed a KJV from 1939 and sure enough, it contained changes including Luke 17:34 & 35. So, yes changes have occurred; how, I do not know. What is/was solid Scripture, Luke 17:34 NEVER said two men in bed. Never. Nor wolf instead of lion, etc. The NIV, by comparison, has been intentionally decimated and its version of John 3:16, is a glaring example. P.S. Crediblity matters especially in serious matters where Scripture is concerned. Spelling of intact, is one word, not “in tact”. Just sayin’.
And I would content that your 1939 KJV has always had the word men in it. Many Bible versions don’t include the ‘men’ as it was added by the King James translators, which is why it’s in italics.
I can cite Bible commentaries from the 18th century, which talk about the passage, and they are based on the King James, and they make not of the word men.
Sorry, I don’t buy that CERN changed physical Bibles and the commentaries about them.
The Mandela Effect really does feel like a Twilight Zone episode to me. I have no clue how or when it started but I believe with the Internet more people than before are able to detect these changes so recently where it seems this effect is some new wacky fad. I find it hard to believe that after decades and in some cases centuries that people can misquote such specific items. You mean that serious bible scholars over the centuries who know every word of the bible didn’t get some verses (Lion/lamb) correct or corrected anyone else? None have thought it odd that unicorns are mentioned in the KJV bible? If werewolves were used in the bible it would seem perfectly normal? Quotes from 30 year old movies have never been publically corrected ? You would think the big movie studios who own the movies would want famous quotes corrected for merchandise purposes. Something definitely seems off.
Unicorn in the bible people have theorized as meaning rhino…people have been debating that for years and years
Is Rev. 6:6 suppose to say penny? Were penny’s being used in 230 AD Rome?
The Greek word for penny is denarion, of Latin origin; a denarius (or ten asses):—pence, penny(-worth). It is usually the smallest denomination within a currency system. The King James was written in 1611, so they used words that related to the English language.
Here is the Geneva Bible study notes from the 16th century on Revelation 6:6, which explains the word penny.
Geneva Bible Footnotes Revelation 6:6
And I heard a voice in the midst of the four beasts say, A (a) measure of wheat for a penny, (5) and three measures of barley for a penny; and see thou hurt not the oil and the wine.
a. It is here signified how little grain there was, for the word used here is a unit of measure for dry things, about an eighth of a bushel, which was a typical daily ration given to servants.
5. I would rather interpret and read the words this way, “And the wine and the oil you will not distribute unjustly.” In this sense likewise the wine and the oil will be sold a very little for a penny. You will not distribute unjustly, namely, when you measure out a very little for a great price: so are the times evident: otherwise it would be true, as the wise man says, that whoever withholds the grain will be cursed by the people; Pr 11:26.
Last question. Acts 27:1. Has it always said “Italy?”
Hi Ford.
Here is Smith’s Bible Dictionary for the word Italy. This word is used in the New Testament, ( Acts 18:2 ; 27:1 ; Hebrews 13:24 ) in the usual sense of the period, i.e. in its true geographical sense, as denoting the whole natural peninsula between the Alps and the Straits of Messina. http://www.biblestudytools.com/dictionaries/smiths-bible-dictionary/italy.html
Albert Barnes’ Notes on the Bible on Acts 27:1
Verse 1. And when it was determined. By Festus, Ac 25:12 and when the time was come when it was convenient to send him.
That we should sail. The use of the term “we” here shows that the author of this book, Luke, was with Paul. He had been the companion of Paul; and though he had not been accused, yet it was resolved that he should still accompany him. Whether he went at his own expense, or whether he was sent at the expense of the Roman government, does not appear. There is a difference of reading here in the ancient versions. The Syriac reads it, “And thus Festus determined that he [Paul] should be sent to Caesar in Italy,” etc. The Latin Vulgate and the Arabic also read “he” instead of “we.” But the Greek manuscripts are uniform; and the correct reading is, doubtless, that which is in our version. Into Italy. The country still bearing the same name, of which Rome was the capital.
John Gill’s Exposition of the Entire Bible on Acts 27:1
And when it was determined that we should sail into Italy, The chief city of which was Rome, the metropolis of the empire, where Caesar had his palace, to whom the apostle had appealed; and his voyage thither was determined by Festus, with the advice of Agrippa and his council, pursuant to the apostle’s appeal, and which was founded on the will of God
Wow you guys are all new earthers. The only reason you’re debunking and think you’ve debunked anything is because it isn’t relevant to your timeline. Honestly you have no clue. The word dumb ass is also now in the bible. For some of the population these are changes and obvious. For others like you well either yoire.from.the age whetr it wss.always like thsy. Oryou didn’t have the word written on your heart or.highlighted verses that literally changed on the pages of your bible. Some won’t ever believe or get it. Lookup “cern” Hadron collider
New earthers? Timeline? You’re just exposing your ignorance of the Scriptures.