The Mandela Effect Debunked

This End Times Deception post debunks the Mandela Effect PSYOP, Psychological Operation.

Here is a video that shows how there appears to be changes in the KJV.

It’s war on the minds of believers to get them to doubt the King James, the one version of the Bible that people believe that they can rely on.

People are saying that CERN was used to travel back in time to make the changes, which then caused our current reality to be different.

But if they traveled back in time to make the changes, then everything would have been changed from that point forward, and everyone would have memories based on their changes.

So if they changed the KJV to say ‘bottles’ instead of ‘wineskins’, then everyone would have a memory of bottles.

Don’t you think that the many employees of Chick-Fil-A would have noticed the name change from Chic-Fil-A, and said something about it?

Don’t you think that the many employees and owners of Ford would have noticed that their logo had changed, and said something about it?

Don’t you think that the many employee’s at J.C. Penney would have noticed the name changed from J.C. Penny, and said something about it?

I worked at a Sears for nine years, and our main competition in the mall was J.C. Penney.  The name has not been changed.

It seems that the Mandela Effect only effects people who see the information on Facebook and YouTube, because the rest of the world has not noticed.

I will provide some proofs below, but here is how you can prove that the words have not been changed in the King James Bible.

Here is a link to Smith’s Bible Dictionary, which has been used by students of the Bible since its introduction in the 1860’s.  Just look up the word that supposedly got changed, and it will show you that it has always been in the King James.

http://www.biblestudytools.com/dictionaries/smiths-bible-dictionary/

Many great theologians have written whole Bible commentaries based on the King James Bible.  You can reference their comments that were written from the 16th-19th centuries, which include the words, proving they have not changed.

Here is a link to Matthew Poole’s English Annotations on the Holy Bible, which was written in the 17th century. Look up the passage to see his notes. http://www.studylight.org/commentaries/mpc.html

I also like Adam Clarke Commentary, which was written in the 19th century.
http://www.studylight.org/commentaries/acc.html

They proclaim that the Lord’s Prayer has been changed.

They seem to be confusing Matthew 6:14-15, which is the long version of the Lord’s Prayer; with Luke 6:14, which is the short version. When they look at Matthew 6:14-15, it doesn’t seem to read as their remember.

“For if ye forgive men their trespasses, your heavenly Father will also forgive you: But if ye forgive not men their trespasses, neither will your Father forgive your trespasses.” Matthew 6:14

What they remember is found in Luke 11:4:

“And it came to pass, that, as he was praying in a certain place, when he ceased, one of his disciples said unto him, Lord, teach us to pray, as John also taught his disciples. And he said unto them, When ye pray, say, Our Father which art in heaven, Hallowed be thy name. Thy kingdom come. Thy will be done, as in heaven, so in earth. Give us day by day our daily bread. And forgive us our sins; for we also forgive every one that is indebted to us. And lead us not into temptation; but deliver us from evil.” Luke 11:1-4

When you look at quotes about the Lord’s Prayer, some people substituted the word “trespasses” from Matthew 6:14, to modify Luke 11:4, so that it reads “And forgive us our trespasses; as we also forgive every one that trespasses against us.”

They proclaim that the lion was changed to a wolf, in Isaiah 11:6

That is an association that people have been conditioned with.  No doubt many Pastors have said ‘the lion and the lamb’, but the Bible has never said that.

Isaiah 65:25 also says the wold, “The wolf and the lamb shall feed together, and the lion shall eat straw like the bullock: and dust shall be the serpent’s meat. They shall not hurt nor destroy in all my holy mountain, saith the LORD.”

Here’s a manuscript from the Dead Sea Scrolls which proves it out.

Wolf and the Lamb, not Lion and the Lamb

Mandela Effect: Lion & Lamb FULLY Debunked with 18 centuries of proof of Isaiah 11:6

If you Google Isaiah 11:6 and look at the images, you see memes like this:

wolf-lamb

Here’s one that creates the false association. The verse says ‘wolf’, but the image has a ‘lion’.

Lion Lamb Wolf Isaiah 11:6 Mandela Effect

If you go to Bible Hub and look up that verse, every Bible version says ‘wolf’.

The NIV, NAS, ESV, NKJ, YLT, etc., all say ‘wolf’.

So the Mandela effect would have had to change all Bibles, not just the King James.

Here are Bibles that preceded the King James, which all say ‘wolf’.

The Geneva Bible (1587)
The wolfe also shall dwell with the lambe, and the leopard shall lie with the kid, & the calfe, and the lyon, and the fat beast together, and a litle childe shall leade them.

The Bishop’s Bible (1568)
The Woolfe shall dwell with the Lambe, and the Leoparde shall lye downe by the Goate: Bullockes, Lions, and cattell, shall kepe company together, so that a litle chylde shall leade them.

Miles Coverdale Bible (1535)
The shal ye wolfe dwel with the labe, and the leoparde shal lye downe by the gote. Bullokes, lyons and catel shal kepe company together, so that a litle childe shal dryue them forth.

The Wycliffe Bible (1395)
A wolf schal dwelle with a lombe, and a parde schal reste with a kide; a calf, and a lioun, and a scheep schulen dwelle togidere, and a litil child schal dryue hem.

And here are Bible commentaries from the top theologians of the 16th-19th century, who all speak of the wolf.

Albert Barnes’ Notes on the Bible 19th century
Isaiah 11:6
The wolf. By nature the wolf preys upon the lamb, and the leopard upon the kid, and the adder is venomous, and the bear, and the cow, and the lion, and the ox, cannot live together.

Adam Clarke’s Commentary on the Bible Early 19th century
Isaiah 11:6
The wolf also shall, etc. “Then shall the wolf,” etc. – The idea of the renewal of the golden age, as it is called, is much the same in the Oriental writers with that of the Greeks and Romans: – the wild beasts grow tame; serpents and poisonous herbs become harmless; all is peace and harmony, plenty and happiness: –

Geneva Bible Footnotes 16th century
Isaiah 11:6
The wolf also shall dwell with the lamb, and the leopard shall lie down with the kid; and the calf and the young lion and the fatling together; and a little child shall lead them.

John Gill’s Exposition of the Entire Bible 18th century
Isaiah 11:6
And the wolf also shall dwell with the lamb,… This, and the three following verses Isa 11:7, describe the peaceableness of the Messiah’s kingdom; and which the Targum introduces in this manner,

Matthew Poole’s Commentary on the Holy Bible 17th century
Isaiah 11:6
Ver. 6. The wolf also shall dwell with the lamb, &c.; the creatures shall be restored to that state of innocency in which they were before the fall of man.

These Bibles and commentaries did not get changed. People associate the Lion and the Lamb, because those are descriptions of Messiah. It’s a false association, that was created by Pastors, by songs, by books, etc.

They proclaim that wineskins was changed to bottles in Matthew 9:17.

Neither do men put new wine into old bottles: else the bottles break, and the wine runneth out, and the bottles perish: but they put new wine into new bottles, and both are preserved.

The translators of the KJV felt that the word ‘bottles’ fit the description best, as they had used bottles 10 other times and the word bottle 14 times.

Bottles: Joshua 9:4, 9:13, 1 Samuel 25:18, Job 32:19, 38:37, Jeremiah 48:12, Hosea 7:5, Matthew 9:17, Mark 2:22, Luke 5:37, 5:38

Bottle: Genesis 21:14, 21:15, 21:19, Judges 4:19, 1 Samuel 1:24, 10:3, 16:20, 2 Samuel 16:1, Psalms 56:8, 119:83, Jeremiah 13:12, 19:1, 19:10, Habakkuk 2:15

“Smith’s Bible Dictionary” has been used by students of the Bible since its introduction in the 1860’s.  For the word ‘bottle‘ is says:

The great leathern bottles are made of the skin of a he-goat, and the small ones, that serve instead of a bottle of water on the road, are made of a kids skin. The effect of external heat upon a skin bottle is indicated in ( Psalms 119:83 ) “a bottle in the smoke,” and of expansion produced by fermentation in ( Matthew 9:17 ) “new wine in old bottles.” Vessels of metal, earthen or glassware for liquids were in use among the Greeks, Egyptians, Etruscans and Assyrians, and also no doubt among the Jews, especially in later times. Thus ( Jeremiah 19:1 ) “a potters earthen bottle.” (Bottles were made by the ancient Egyptians of alabaster, gold, ivory and stone. They were of most exquisite workmanship and elegant forms. Tear-bottles were small urns of glass or pottery, made to contain the tears of mourners at funerals, and placed in the sepulchres at Rome and in Palestine. In some ancient tombs they are found in great numbers. ( Psalms 56:8 ) refers to this custom.–ED.)

The following esteemed theologians who wrote King James Bible commentaries during the 17th-19th centuries, all describe the use of the word ‘bottles’.

Albert Barnes’ Notes on the New and Old Testaments.
John Calvin’s Commentaries.
Adam Clarke’s Commentary on the Bible.
Commentary from the 1599 edition of the Geneva Bible.
John Gill’s Exposition of the Entire Bible.
Jamieson-Fausset-Brown Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible.
Matthew Henry’s Whole Bible Commentary.
Matthew Poole’s Commentary on the Holy Bible.
John Wesley’s Bible Notes.

Every modern Bible uses the word bottles, instead of wineskins as used in the King James.

Most pastors do not use the King James due to archaic language, so they no doubt have repeatedly used the word wineskins, which created the association in people’s minds.

They proclaim that the word ‘tires‘ was inserted into Ezekiel 24:23

And your tires shall be upon your heads, and your shoes upon your feet: ye shall not mourn nor weep; but ye shall pine away for your iniquities, and mourn one toward another.

“Smith’s Bible Dictionary” has been used by students of the Bible since its introduction in the 1860′. For the word ‘tire‘ it says:

an old English word for headdress. It was an ornamental headdress worn on festive occasions, ( Ezekiel 24:17 Ezekiel 24:23 ) and perhaps, as some suppose, also an ornament for the neck worn by both women, ( Isaiah 3:18 ) and men, and even on the necks of camels. ( Judges 8:21 Judges 8:26 )

John Gill, a biblical scholar in the 18th century, wrote a whole Bible commentary on the King James called John Gill’s Exposition of the Entire Bible. For Ezekiel 24:23 he confirms that is says tires.

And your tires shall be upon your heads, and your shoes upon your feet. As will be necessary while travelling, and when carrying captive to a foreign country, as now will be their case:

It’s not talking about car tires, but an ornamental headdress that people wore on their head.

They proclaim that Messiah has been changed from being the ‘cornerstone‘ to the ‘head of the corner‘.

Once again, it’s just ignorance of other Scriptures which declare that Messiah is the cornerstone, which causes them to believe that 1 Peter 2:7 has been changed.

which be disobedient, the stone which the builders disallowed, the same is made the head of the corner,

In the previous verse, 1 Peter 2:6, Peter declares that Messiah is the corner stone.

Wherefore also it is contained in the scripture, Behold, I lay in Sion a chief corner stone, elect, precious: and he that believeth on him shall not be confounded.

The Scriptures still declared that Messiah is the cornerstone.

Jesus saith unto them, Did ye never read in the scriptures, The stone which the builders rejected, the same is become the head of the corner: this is the Lord’s doing, and it is marvellous in our eyes? Matthew 21:42

And have ye not read this scripture; The stone which the builders rejected is become the head of the corner: Mark 12:10

And he beheld them, and said, What is this then that is written, The stone which the builders rejected, the same is become the head of the corner? Luke 20:17

This is the stone which was set at nought of you builders, which is become the head of the corner. Acts 4:11

For the king knoweth of these things, before whom also I speak freely: for I am persuaded that none of these things are hidden from him; for this thing was not done in a corner. Acts 26:26

And are built upon the foundation of the apostles and prophets, Jesus Christ himself being the chief corner stone; Ephesians 2:20

1 Peter 2:7 was not changed. Peter had just provided another way to say it, as he had already said ‘corner stone’ in the previous verse.

They proclaim that Luke 17:34-35 said ‘two people’ would be in the same bed, not two men.

I tell you, in that night there shall be two men in one bed; the one shall be taken, and the other shall be left.
Two women shall be grinding together; the one shall be taken, and the other left.

The context of the passage is not about Messiah teaching against sexual perversion.  He was simply naming times when two people would be together, in similar circumstances; one taken, one not.

In our privileged world we think that the only reason two men would be in the same bed is for sexual perversion.  Go live in a poor country and you will see that they sleep in the same bed.    In a situation where many people have to live in the same house, should a man and woman who aren’t married sleep in the same bed?  No!  The men should sleep in the same bed, to ‘prevent‘ sexual problems.

They proclaim that Luke 17:35 used to say that two women were grinding at the mill, but now are just grinding, which they say is a perversion.

Luke 17:35 never had the word mill, but Matthew 24:41 does, “Two women shall be grinding at the mill; the one shall be taken, and the other left.”

Just another case of people not doing their homework to see that one Gospel has the word mill, thus the association; which they think has been changed in Luke. The word mill was never in Luke, so nothing has been changed.

The two women ground together because it took both of them to operate the hand mill, as one could not do it alone.

People proclaim that Exodus 13:12 used to say ‘womb’, but now says ‘matrix’. 

That thou shalt set apart unto the LORD all that openeth the matrix, and every firstling that cometh of a beast which thou hast; the males shall be the LORD’S.”

They are thinking of Exodus 13:2, which says “Sanctify unto me all the firstborn, whatsoever openeth the womb among the children of Israel, both of man and of beast: it is mine.

So it’s just a matter of confusion between the two verses, which have never changed.

They claim that Peanuts writer Charles M. Schulz’s name used to be Schultz.

I grew up loving Snoopy! His name was never Schultz, that is just an association that people have because that name is more common. People hear Schulz and just assume that it’s spelled Schultz.

Don’t you think that his family would have noticed the name change and said something?

Does it really seem plausible that CERN changed every newspaper that was ever printed which featured his comic strip? And all of the merchandise was changed too? I think not!

Here are links to images of Charles Schulz’s star on the Hollywood Walk of Fame.
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/21/Schulz_star.jpg/800px-Schulz_star.jpg

Charles M. Schulz Highland Arena on Snelling Avenue and Ford Parkway in Saint Paul, Minnesota. https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/5/58/Charles_M._Schulz_Highland_Arena.JPG

And his Congressional Gold Medal
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/13/Charles_Schulz_Congressional_Gold_Medal_obverse.jpg

Here is a testimony from Ryan James who had originally proclaimed that the Mandela Effect was true.  He follows it with proofs that it is not true.

I’m burdened to share with you what all I’ve learned since posting about the Mandela Effect last Saturday night. I must say again that I’m terribly sorry for posting about this without examining it further. Like many, I was beyond shocked to see a Scripture that I had known for years was not the way I thought it was in the KJV Bible. I felt like a spell had been cast or somehow history was changed.

After further examination, time with God, and fellowship with trusted brethren, I must say that I do believe this is all a demonic PSYOP to make many question God’s Holy Word, question their sanity, and also to discredit the truth movement.

What they have done is they took many things that the masses thought were true and used it against us to make us think it actually was and that we are somehow living in another reality.

I’m going to debunk each and every example that I posted with hopes that the ones that still believe in this will not give into this deception any longer. This is deep psychological warfare and we need to be aware of Satan’s devices.

Example 1 Debunked- Matthew 7:1 is a verse that many, including myself thought was, “Judge not, lest ye be judged..” and the KJV states that it’s “Judge not, that ye be not judged.” Now, to begin with, the meaning is the exact same. If Satan was going to try to change God’s Word, he wouldn’t change a verse to mean the exact same thing. It just doesn’t make sense. Yes, the serpent is subtle, but his changes would effect the meaning of a verse or passage. When Paul Washer quoted Judge not, lest ye be judged…”, he wasn’t quoting it from his Bible. It he was, then yes, RED FLAG. But that’s not the case. You can go online and see time and time again that Matthew 7:1 in the KJV has always been “Judge not, that ye be not judged.” Many people, including myself thought that “lest ye be judged” came from the KJV because it’s Old English or Shakespearean if you will, but it did not. The Orthodox Jewish Bible does state the misquote of Matthew 7:1 the way we thought it was. When people repeat things over and over, you will in fact believe it is true. It never came out of the KJV from what I can gather, it’s just highly misquoted.

Example 2 Debunked- Matthew 9:17 has the word “bottles” instead of “wineskins.” Again, this doesn’t change the meaning of this verse the slightest bit. It seems as though every other version of the Bible says “wineskins” and it’s been repeated and preached so much that there’s no reason to believe it doesn’t say “wineskins.” Apparently the translators of the KJV thought “bottles” fit the Scriptures best as in comparison to “wineskins.” You can go on You Tube and see for yourself many preachers reading “bottles” out of the KJV. God’s Word will always stand. If changes are made to the Bible, scholars of the Word of God would gather and have the correct one printed in days.

Example 3 Debunked- “Sex and the City” used to be “Sex in the City.” Not true. Although, “Sex in the City” makes much more sense, it’s been misspoken time and time again, even in newspaper articles and promotions. It’s always been “Sex and the City.” Subconsciously, “Sex in the City” sounds much better. Our memories are still in tact guys. You want to know the truth? Call up the producers or cast members or die hard fans.

Example 4 Debunked- Mr. Rogers Neighborhood Theme Song “It’s a beautiful day in this neighborhood” is a highly misquoted song lyric. Many say, “It’s a beautiful day in THE neighborhood” instead of “THIS.” It’s been repeated wrong in movies, TV shows, and because “the” sounds better than “this” in our subconscious, we say it wrong thinking it’s the right lyric. Ask anyone that worked on the show. It’s always been “this” and not “the”.

Example 5 Debunked- This one freaked me out a bit and it’s the fact the movie “Interview with the Vampire” is misquoted often as “Interview with A Vampire.” It’s another one of those things that makes much more sense in our subconscious, so we say it thinking its correct. You can look back at old interviews and posters and promotions and it’s always been “Interview with THE Vampire.” Humans tend to say what makes sense the most. It’s been misquoted on TV and magazines and people that see that think it’s the correct title, when it’s not.

Example 6 Debunked- this one is easier to explain. The movie “Snow White and the 7 dwarfs” has a famous quote, “Magic Mirror on the wall, who is the fairest one of them all?” The masses believe it’s “”Mirror, Mirror on the wall” instead because if you go back to the actual children’s book of “Snow White” it’s quoted “Mirror, Mirror.” Generally, plays and musicals will go by what the book says rather than the movie itself and that’s why you hear the quote, “Mirror, Mirror on the wall” all of the time. It was actually used. Just not in the movie.

Example 7 Debunked- This one is also easily explained and it’s the fact many believe that “Berenstain Bears” used to be spelled “Berenstein Bears.” Not true. Here’s why. The publishers of “Berenstain Bears” didn’t sign onto many other books, plays, posters, toys, advertisements, etc. with the spelling of “Berenstein Bears.” You did actually see It spelled like you might remember it, but it wasn’t on the official books. It’s another one of those things that sounds better, so your subconscious went right along with it.

Example 8 Debunked- “Looney Tunes” is not “Looney Toons” although it looks so much better. It’s yet another subconscious mind trick. “Toons” is short for “cartoon”, so of course you would think its “Toons” and not “Tunes”. Not the case. You may have thought it was “Toons” because there were shows like “Tiny Toons Adventures” that had it spelled the other way.

Example 9 Debunked- This one got me pretty good. It’s from Star Wars Episode 5 where Darth Vader says to Luke, “No, I am your father.” It’s been repeated “Luke, I am your father” in movies, TV shows, advertisements, t-shirts, and all sorts of others things. There’s been articles about this misquote for many years. Even the biggest Star Wars fans get it wrong. It’s yet another subconscious mind trick. Someone said it, the masses caught on, and the rest is history.

Note: The original film came out in 1977 a time before the internet and everybody remembers the original line which says “Luke I am your father“. Fast forward to current times and you will find that the film has been remastered and re-release on DVD; it is on this current version that it now says “No I am your father“.

Example 10 Debunked- The TV commercial for Sara Lee goes “Nobody doesn’t like Sara Lee.” But that doesn’t make sense, right? That is exactly why we think it’s “Nobody does it like Sara Lee.” It’s not correct. People have been misquoting this for dozens of years. You can just do a quick Google search and see that it’s one of the most misquoted slogans of all time. Satan knew it and he used it for his advantage.

Well guys, it’s been a tough 3-4 days for me. I barely slept Saturday evening and Sunday at work, I felt like I stepped into the Matrix. But suddenly, people like Joshua Busby and others were coming up with resources debunking mistruths and at first, I was a little upset because I was convinced it was true. But when I woke up on Monday morning, the Holy Spirit told me that this is all a lie.

I began researching and looking over God’s Word again and concluded that I had been tricked. This is the type of mind tricks that magicians and mediums will do to freak your mind out. It’s pure psychological trickery. Nobody went back in time and changed anything. God’s Word hasn’t changed. Rest easy friends.

Please, do not tie this PSYOP to other conspiracies that people in the truth movement present. It’s illogical and misleading. Most of this world is blind and deceived by indoctrination and what they see on the Tell-lie-vision and mainstream media outlets. Truthers are going to be wrong about things. We are human. It’s when truthers refuse to admit they as wrong that causes problems.

I URGE YOU GUYS WITH ALL SINCERITY >>DO NOT PUSH THIS PSYOP<< People will discredit you and shut everything you said in the past off as “conspiracy” instead of truth. I want this post to edify and reprove anyone that is still thinking the Word of God had changed. It hasn’t! It’s the SAME. I love you guys.

Save

342 thoughts on “The Mandela Effect Debunked”

  1. You are doing what you can. I believe a prayer for protection around your church and houses should be done and done often with many people. Also i believe that highlighted words cannot be changed but i have yet to prove this. There is a group of people that own a book atore in louisianna that are studying all verses and all typse to see where the change is happening. A book is an object even if its the word of God. Pray and have faith he will always be with us.

    Reply
      • I suppose piss and dumb ass was in your bible in your timeline as well huh. ?

        “◄ 2 Peter 2:16 ►

        Parallel Verses

        King James Version
        But was rebuked for his iniquity: the dumb ass speaking with man’s voice forbad the madness of the prophet.

        Reply
        • Bible commentaries that were written in the 18th century, that use the King James, explain the word piss. Please don’t tell me that CERN changed all of their commentaries too.

          This passage is referring to what people do in the extreme stages of drought and famine, they eat and drink their waste.

          John Gill’s Exposition of the Entire Bible Isaiah 36:12
          But Rabshakeh said, hath my master sent me to thy master, and to thee, to speak these words?… That is, to them only, that he should use a language only understood by them:

          hath he not sent me to the men that sit upon the wall; and therefore it is proper to speak in a language which they understand, and to let them know that if they will not surrender up the city, but will attempt to hold out a siege, they must expect

          that they may eat their own dung, and drink their own piss with you? suggesting that they must expect a close siege, which would not be broke up until the city was taken; the consequence of which would be such a famine, that they would be reduced to such extremities. The Jews have substituted other words in the margin, instead of those in the text, as more cleanly, and less offensive; for “dung” they put “excrement”, and for “piss” they read “the waters of the feet”; and had we in our version put excrement and urine instead of these words, it would have been more decent.

          Instead of a dumb ass, one who could not speak, the passage is speaking about one that is not dumb, meaning that it could speak.

          John Gill’s Exposition of the Entire Bible 2 Peter 2:16
          But was rebuked for his iniquity,… Which was not merely going along with the messengers of Balak, for he had leave from the Lord so to do, Nu 22:20; but going along with them with a desire to curse Israel, when it was the will of God he should go and bless them, in order to get Balak’s money; so that his governing iniquity was covetousness, which led him to other sins; and for this he was rebuked by the angel, Nu 22:32, as well as reproved by his ass, Nu 22:28, for

          the dumb ass, as it was naturally so, the ass on which he rode,

          speaking with man’s voice; which was supernatural and miraculous, for it was God that opened the mouth of the ass: the mouth of that ass is said, by the Jews1, to be one of the ten things created between the two evenings on the sixth day of the creation; that is, as the gloss on it says, concerning which it was decreed, that its mouth should be opened to speak what this ass said; and the occasion of it may be seen in Nu 22:22. Lactantius2 observes, that there are two stars in the constellation of Cancer, which the Greeks call the “asses”; and which, the poets feign, are those that carried Liberus over a river, when he could not pass it; to one of which he gave this for a reward, “ut humana voce loqueretur”, “that it should speak with man’s voice”; a fable, no doubt, hatched from the sacred history, and said in imitation of this ass. Which

          forbad the madness of the prophet: and so Balaam, though a diviner and soothsayer, is called by the Jewish writers3; who, they say, was first a prophet, and then a soothsayer, from whom Jerom4 seems to have received the tradition; who says, that he was first a holy man, and a prophet of God, and afterwards, through disobedience, and a desire of gifts, was called a diviner; for his eyes were opened, and he saw the vision of the Almighty; and the Spirit of God came upon him, and he prophesied many things concerning Israel, and the Messiah, and others, Nu 24:4. His madness lay in going with the messengers of Balak, Nu 22:21, in order to curse Israel, contrary to the will of God, Nu 22:12; and it is madness in any to oppose God in his counsels, purposes, providences, and precepts; and every sin, which is an act of hostility against God, has madness in it; and this of Balaam’s was forbid by his ass, and he was convinced of it. Very appropriately is mention made of this dumb ass, when the persons here spoken of were as natural brute beasts, and worse than them, 2Pe 2:12.

          Reply
  2. So you’re telling me that you’ve never heard two women grinding at the mill verse?
    Luke 17.34,35
    And you’ve always read two men in bed together??? Wow. From my reading. And ive read that a lot. It was always two women grinding at the mill. Not grinding together. And right after the two men in bed thing. Wow. Just wow. This Is a.subtle change but just very immature

    Reply
    • Luke 17:35 does not say that the two women were grinding at the mill, but Matthew 24:41 does, “Two women shall be grinding at the mill; the one shall be taken, and the other left.”

      Just another case of people not doing their homework to see that one Gospel has the word mill, thus the association; which they think has been changed in Luke. The word mill was never in Luke, so nothing has been changed.

      Reply
      • The BOTH did before. Both chapters said at the mill. Without a doubt. And it didn’t day two men in one bed. It said two men shall be in the field. One taken the other left

        Reply
        • Luke 17:34 says “I tell you, in that night there shall be two men in one bed; the one shall be taken, and the other shall be left.”

          The word men in the King James is in italics, meaning that it was not part of the original text, but added by the translators.

          Same thing with the two women in the field.

          The passages should just say there were two in the bed and two in the field.

          There were no changes.

          John Gill’s Exposition of the Entire Bible Luke 17:34
          I tell you, in that night,… Of affliction and calamity, that shall be upon the Jewish nation, and which is before called that day, Lu 17:31 and therefore is not to be understood literally of the night:

          there shall be two men in one bed; this is said agreeably to the time, the night before mentioned, that being the time to be in bed, at rest and asleep; for they that sleep, sleep in the night; and still suggests the security the people of the Jews would be in, at the time of their destruction. The word “men” is not in the text, it is only, “there shall be two in one bed”; and may as well be understood of a man and his wife, since it is not so usual for two men to lie in one bed; and this the rather more strongly expresses the distinguishing providence of God in saving one, and suffering the other to be taken and lost: the words may be rendered, “there shall be two upon one couch”: that is, sitting together at supper, which was also in the night season: it was the custom of the ancients to sit upon beds, or couches, at meals; and they had a bed, or couch, which held two persons only, and was called Biclinium1: and so this likewise intimates, that the destruction of the Jews would be at a time when they were thoughtless of it, and were eating and drinking, as in the days of Noah and of Lot, Lu 17:27.

          The one shall be taken; by the Roman soldiers:

          and the other shall be left; being, by one providence or another preserved; which is mentioned, to show the distinction God will make in his providence, and to encourage believers to trust in it.

          John Gill’s Exposition of the Entire Bible Luke 17:36
          Two men shall be in the field,… At work there, tilling the ground, or sowing the seed in it, or reaping the corn; which of them soever was the work of the field, at the time of Jerusalem’s destruction:

          the one shall be taken, and the other left: the circumstances attending these several, instances show, that they cannot be considered as expressive of the use and effect of the preaching of the Gospel, that being the savour of life unto life to some, and the savour of death unto death to others, some being effectually called by it, and others being left to die in their sins; since these men and women are said to be either in a bed asleep, or on a couch feasting, or grinding in a mill, or at work in the field, and so not in proper places, and at leisure to hear the Gospel preached. The whole verse is left out in the Ethiopic version, and in some Greek copies; though it is in the Syriac, Arabic, and Persic versions, and in the Complutensian edition, and in some ancient copies, as Beza observes.

          Reply
  3. I myself in my search for truth of the “effect” was brought to this video…please watch it and let me know your thoughts.

    Reply
    • That was an interesting video. Makes me think more of the Terminator movie becoming reality, than it does the Mandela Effect.

      Reply
  4. I have a degree in psychology and I was lucky to study psychology when cognitive-behavioral approach in psychology became the main scientific paradigm promoted by our professors. This is the same paradigm that was created at Tavistock Institute and heavily pushed on american, british and later, worldwide, psychology higher education. It is the most rigurous way to study the human mind and behavior and was extensively used in the last decades by many institutes and think-tanks to understand how human psyche works and to find the most efficient ways to alter and control it. Although I am not familiar, by my primary culturalisation, with most of the
    subjects of the pretended Mandela modification, as I live in Europe, in a orthodox-christian country, I have seen enough of what is going on on the Internet on this matter to say that this is undoubtedly a very clever Psy-op and that its religious aspect involves not only cognitive manipulation but also the participation of some “christian” groups. I will give only one example, that I was able to identify because at some time in the past came in contact with one of these false original Bible verses (the substitute for the real Isaiah 11:6), in a Yehovah’s witnesses publication. I was only a teenager then and not an Old Testament reader and it was the first time I have red that verse. I don’t remember the actual verse but I remember the colourful illustration attached to it, of a lion next to a lamb, that firmly imprinted in my memory and altered my perception of the verse when I had finally read it in a orthodox Bible. And it remained corrupted in that way, until I had been challenged to pay more attention to the text. Knowing what I know now about psychological manipulation and different religious sects and seeing the confusion and the conflict that this conspiracy had created, I have no doubt that the original was indeed “wolf”, even though I have also had the false impression that it was another word. And I am also convinced that this whole scheme was concocted a long period of time.

    Reply
      • To see the truth, we need to look at external proofs. Many theologians have written whole Bible commentaries during the 16th-20th century, which are based on the King James, and they say bottles in their commentary. CERN did not change their comments.

        The comments from these Bible commentaries all say bottles.

        Albert Barnes’ Notes on the New and Old Testaments.
        John Calvin’s Commentaries.
        Adam Clarke’s Commentary on the Bible.
        Commentary from the 1599 edition of the Geneva Bible.
        John Gill’s Exposition of the Entire Bible.
        Jamieson-Fausset-Brown Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible.
        Matthew Henry’s Whole Bible Commentary.
        Matthew Poole’s Commentary on the Holy Bible.
        John Wesley’s Bible Notes.

        Smith’s Bible Dictionary, which was written in the 19th century, has the word ‘bottles’ and even includes Matthew 9:17 in the comments

        http://www.biblestudytools.com/dictionaries/smiths-bible-dictionary/bottle.html

        The Arabs keep their water, milk and other liquids in leathern bottles. These are made of goatskins. When the animal is killed they cut off its feet and its head, and draw it in this manner out of the skin without opening its belly. The great leathern bottles are made of the skin of a he-goat, and the small ones, that serve instead of a bottle of water on the road, are made of a kids skin. The effect of external heat upon a skin bottle is indicated in ( Psalms 119:83 ) “a bottle in the smoke,” and of expansion produced by fermentation in ( Matthew 9:17 ) “new wine in old bottles.” Vessels of metal, earthen or glassware for liquids were in use among the Greeks, Egyptians, Etruscans and Assyrians, and also no doubt among the Jews, especially in later times. Thus ( Jeremiah 19:1 ) “a potters earthen bottle.” (Bottles were made by the ancient Egyptians of alabaster, gold, ivory and stone. They were of most exquisite workmanship and elegant forms. Tear-bottles were small urns of glass or pottery, made to contain the tears of mourners at funerals, and placed in the sepulchres at Rome and in Palestine. In some ancient tombs they are found in great numbers. ( Psalms 56:8 ) refers to this custom.–ED.)

        Sorry, but CERN did not change all of those commentaries and Bible Dictionaries.

        Reply
  5. Memories are a fickle thing. Just ask police detectives about interviewing witnesses.. our minds have a built in safety to forget things unless you have a photographic memory.

    Stressors can also change how the brain stores memories.

    Reply
    • Great insight Trent! I think that Pastors have taught things one way, using Bible versions other than the KJV, which people then think have changed in the KJV.

      Reply
  6. Hi,
    I really enjoyed reading your article, but I have to disagree. this is absolutely the most bizarre phenomena that I have ever experienced.

    A few months ago, I started getting politically involved, and started looking into the JFK assassination as well. Upon watching the video, I was convinced the secret service agent shot Kennedy. It was a 4 seat car. The theory stood that the 2 girls that stood on the opposite side of the street from the camera, facing the camera, in the black and red dress, were an illuminati symbol for the timing of the shot. The actual theory i remember, is that right after passing those 2 girls, you can clearly see the secret service agent turn left, and face kennedy, then immediately turn around, Mrs. Kennedy, then began to flee the car. It was believed that she was fleeing the car because she knew the secret service agent shot him.

    This video has changed drastically from the version that I remember. I know without any doubt that I am not remembering it wrong. I have a photographic memory, and watched this video many times, because it perplexed me. I am so confused on why this video looks different now.

    I appreciate your insight, but I implore you not to discredit individuals because they have memories that contradict your own. We are living in strange times.

    Reply
    • Paul, I have not discredited anyone, but have simply provided explanations for some of the supposed changes. But people who believe in the Mandela effect can’t admit that these points are valid. Go ask a Chick-Fil-A manager if the name has been changed! If some of the supposed changes are invalid, then that should cause people to have some doubt, and seek to prove everything. And yes, we live in strange times indeed!

      Reply
    • Paul…Thank you thank you! I’ve watched the JFK car in the Zapruder film so many times, from every angle. I have seen all of the snapshots. Everything. Watched the documentaries, theories. I have a great memory too. There was NEVER a center set of seats nor was there ever that glass window divider. The car wasn’t stretched as long and there were 4, not 6 people.

      Reply
  7. Thank you so much for all of your information. I was at a Bible Study tonight and the minister said it is soon coming a time of testing of true believers.

    Reply
  8. Are you of the opinion that this statement does refer to the second coming?

    “For the Lord himself shall descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of the archangel, and with the trump of God: and the dead in Christ shall rise first: Then we which are alive and remain shall be caught up together with them in the clouds, to meet the Lord in the air: and so shall we ever be with the Lord.” 1 Thessalonians 4:16-17

    Thank you.

    Reply
    • Thank you Mark! I corrected it. FYI, I worked at Sears for nine years and our main competition in the mall was J.C. Penney. The name has not been changed from J.C. Penny.

      Reply
  9. You didn’t debunk anything and do not understand what is going on at all. The Mandela effect is real. Reality is shifting.

    Reply
    • The comments prove that the people who are convinced of it, remain convinced. And the people who are looking for truth, find many of the supposed changes are not real.

      Reply
  10. OK, debunk this. Exodus 13:2 up until a while ago said womb. Then about a month ago ALL of the KJV bibles said matrix. Now it is back to womb. I have had bible apologists and de bunkers all say it has ALWAYS said matrix. Now womb. You people are either scared or just out and out lying to protect what you thought was real.

    Reply
    • Sure thing. Try reading Exodus 13:12, which says “That thou shalt set apart unto the LORD all that openeth the matrix, and every firstling that cometh of a beast which thou hast; the males shall be the LORD’S.”

      Now compare that to Exodus 13:2, which says “Sanctify unto me all the firstborn, whatsoever openeth the womb among the children of Israel, both of man and of beast: it is mine.

      So it’s just a matter of confusion between the two verses, which have never changed. DEBUNKED!

      Reply
    • The changes have been made, and many people do not care, are too asleep, or it is too traumatizing to accept it. God does not change. C.W.Lindsey thank you for pointing out the passage about the word womb changing to the word matrix and back again! What the heck is going on I am not sure, but seeing the true word come back is starting to make it almost a little fun. On the Quantum level, everything is a possibility, particles are not set until they are observed, and the observer affects the outcome. Obviously God is allowing something to happen, and continuing to affirm our identity in Him through Jesus Christ is our salvation. Imagine if this new way of experiencing reality could ultimately be kind of fun? Dare I say it? Is it possible that what Christ taught is simply manifesting instantly, rather than over a longer span of time. He told us many things about thoughts, that to lust in our minds is the same as committing the sin. He said we could do all that He has done and more. He said if we told the mountain to move, that it would. Was He teaching us about the Quantum field and how to navigate it???

      Reply
      • O.K., still seeing the altered word in the NKJV staying at matrix for 13:12, so the NKJV is clearly the one being attacked most. I am still going to be anxious for nothing and continue to put my faith in Jesus Christ. I’m glad to have fellow Christians who are awake!!!

        Reply
  11. Well guess what we are all living in a delusion of acceptance.
    We did not win the revolutionary war. The general never relinquished his sword ( it is called a maximum of war)
    he had a subordinate do it. The united states was United states for America. The queen just Incorporated UNITED STATES OF AMERICA still maintained absolute control. Duh presidents are not elected THEY are appointed your vote means nothing. You are considered a monster according to Blacks law dictionary, monsters have no rights ( Look up meaning of human being)
    . Your name is all capital letters because they cannot deal with anything but a fiction until you give them permission because they the courts are a fiction. There is so much deception open you eyes.

    Reply
      • Understand that we always need to make room to accept to admit that “I believed a lie”
        The Holy Spirit showed me that God is the author of the Judgements. Every change is a message then to Saints and tells us to hold on the first seal has broken.
        Historic Interpretation True
        End Time Interpretation True
        The Judgements will fall on those who fear.

        For All:
        Admit God does all this.
        Credit not man. God lets them think they do these things. HAARP=Harp in heaven to me and was my confirmation.
        The way the leader of Babylon with Ishtar from Zechariah 5 on his back has mocked us in the Correspondance Dinner and his huge smile he walks with now and smirks tells me they think they do these things too. Well know God does it. The psalm of Almaroth tells us. The Big Lie is to believe man did it. I call the lie walk free of fear until Im murdered on my appointed day. When the attacks start of Isis seal 2, then seal 3, then WW3 seal 4, and so on. After 3 and a half years the beast rises to full power of the 10 heads and the mark and division of world in 10 zones.

        You remember what you remember. Only speak of the Bible. Stop watching news and youtube videos folks. And throw your commentaries out the window. And preach the Gospel. Spread faith not fear. Call the lie, tell people, it is God who does these things.

        Remember all the agreements lately with Cuba, Iran, Russia and the trade agreements?
        Donald Trump has been prophesied to rise and protect America for a little while.

        I make room to be wrong. Admit you believed a lie that you thought CERN did this.

        God I admit I believed a lie. Thank you for giving me power over fear and the lie.

        Lets bare some fruit Saints until the 2nd coming. Speak positively, show love, strength, and fearlessness as a testimony to the ones in fear with no hope.

        People do lose their salvation now brethren.
        Its life and death.
        Repeat with me.
        “I beliveth not the lie.”
        Say it all day.

        Stop talking about Simpsons and Jiffy. Dont go back into your house to get your Stuf. Know God is defending us and the falling away, is the lies falling away. The Earth is flat. Aliens arent real. Demons are. No two timelines. Two worlds, one I can see and one I cannot. Be Biblical.
        No AstroNAUT. I believed a lie. Its okay.
        The Bible Pops Now. So clear now once I called the Lie.

        That pastor who said, well praise God it still means the same thing, and carried on is a true soldier of God.

        Christian remember no guns, no cursing, no course joking, no complaining, keep your hands to yourself.

        The Lie Fell Away. Even the NWO proponents are telling us their lies so when they tell us the next lies we believe them.

        As concerning the gospel, they are enemies for your sakes: but as touching the election, they are beloved for the fathers’ sakes.

        Love the Hebrew

        Im concerned for the ones who will sleep until they die.

        @ThisWorldDoethLie
        Follow Me

        Reply
  12. Michelle, you are absolutely right there are so many that have drank the cool-aid.
    Most people even ministers try to explain it away by saying well this means the same. Are they nuts there minds just stoped thinking and are not open to other
    alternate possibility come on I am so sick of people with such infinitesimal small understand. It is Satan you idiots you all so easily talked about him your whole life well guess what here he IS. Good LUCK.

    Reply

Leave a Reply