The Truth Behind The Nation State Of Israel

This End Times Deceptions Bible study reviews the truth about why the nation of the state of Israel was created, to reinforce their deception about a futuristic 70th week of Daniel, the supposed future 7-year tribulation period.

Only when you understand who the biblical, historical and prophetic Antichrist is you will grasp the futurist deception taught by the Vatican and the Society of Jesus.

All of a sudden you will see the whole world with other eyes and you will notice that the Inquisition has never stopped, it just took another name.

Nowadays it is done by wars that you willingly accept through indoctrinated Patriotism. There is only one Kingdom a bible believing person in knowledge of the truth can be patriotic for – The Kingdom of our LORD Jesus Christ.

The modern nation state of Israel is an unbiblical, futurist deception by the Vatican and the Jesuits.

Watch this video to learn more about this.

The 70th week of Daniel was fulfilled on time, after the 69th week, from 27-34 A.D., when Messiah and His Disciples confirmed that it was Him who is the promised Messiah, who ratified the covenant made with Abraham, with His Holy sacrifice.

Related Study: The Covenant In The 70th Week Of Daniel Is Jesus New Covenant

2 thoughts on “The Truth Behind The Nation State Of Israel”

  1. Yeah, about the whole Reagan being sworn in on the West Side of the Capitol thing…

    “The truth is that the Joint Committee on the Inauguration announced its decision to move the inauguration from the east to the west side of the Capitol in June 1980, more than a month before Republicans nominated Reagan, and for more pragmatic reasons than commentators suspect. The congressional committee calculated that the move would save money, since they could use the West Front terraces as an inaugural platform rather than build one from scratch, and that the Mall side of the Capitol would provide more space for spectators. Construction of the inaugural platform began in September 1980, when Reagan and Jimmy Carter were running even in the polls and the election’s outcome remained uncertain. Had Carter had won reelection, or if John Anderson had pulled off an upset, either would have been inaugurated on West Front, too.”

    Source: https://blog.oup.com/2009/01/moving_inauguration/

    Reply

Leave a Reply